Saturday, December 22, 2018

Q Post

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 879143 No.4409412 📁
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1076128583419088896📁
HUSSEIN "ISIS JV TEAM…."
Did ISIS form on HUSSEIN's watch?
Did HUSSEIN take care of business or allow them to expand?
How long did it take POTUS to ERADICATE and DESTROY ISIS?
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP TO THE TRUTH.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/197-military-officers-purged-by-obama/📁
Why did HUSSEIN attempt to destroy our military (weaken)?
What was the 16-year plan to destroy America?
Why did HUSSEIN install traitors at the highest levels of our Gov't?
Think DOJ.
Think FBI.
Think C_A.
Think NAT SEC.
Why did HUSSEIN bring people into the WH who HATE AMERICA and what we stand for?
What years did HRC serve as Sec of State?
What years did ISIS expand?
Why did HUSSEIN put restrictions on US MIL COMMAND re: ABILITY TO ATTACK TARGETS AT WILL > WH DIRECT APPROVAL REQ FOR EACH ACTION?
FACTS NOT FICTION.
BLIND SHEEP FOLLOW.
EYES ON TARGET.
Q

Monday, December 10, 2018

"Protecting" Muslims from "Hate Speech"....

Muslim groups assert that "slandering Islam is an abuse of free speech". Sadly politicians in the West are caving in to demands for "hate speech" laws. But here's the reality:

  • Muslims are using the Shari'a definition of "slander" not the Western one, which means "to mention anything to a person that he would dislike...".[1] whether or not what was said is true.
  • Under the Western definition "slander" is defined as " an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed."[2] In the West, the truth is an absolute defense against a charge of slander. But not so under the Shari'a.
So the bottom line is this: Muslim groups want to criminalize our saying anything about Islam, which is a gross violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. It's not an issue of saying bad things as it is telling the truth. The Muslims want to remove our right to hold them accountable for the killing of apostates, beating wives, calling Jews apes and pigs, calling for Holy War, honor killings, beheadings, rape gangs, the works. Speaking of such things is a public service, especially when what is said is true. 

To reveal such things about Islam is NOT "incitement to hatred and discrimination" per se. But that may be the natural public reaction to the revelations of the atrocities permitted under the Shari'a Law. Such public revulsion may be richly deserved.











[1] "Reliance of the Traveller" Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller, Amana Publications, Beltsville MD, 1991, r2.2 page 730
[2] https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/slander,  accessed 12/10/2018

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

RUMINATIONS ON SEX ROBOTS

The church would condemn them, in that it is a short circuitry to family formation. An expensive step beyond masturbation but short of patronizing prostitutes.

The feminists condemn them because "it teaches men to be rapists".  That doesn't follow in my opinion. Men find release without involving real live women. So rape is not involved. A loose definition of rape is men seeking release without a woman's permission. I know there are other aspects: asserting power and dominion and all that. But that's beyond the scope of the discussion here.

But the reality is: there are men who are unable to strike relationships with women that lead to intimacy.  Robots give such men a harmless way to find release. This is certainly better than the abuse of real women stuck in brothels. And robots may be more satisfying than auto eroticism, (though more expensive).

Even in the best of marriages, there is a disparity between appetites.  My observation is that men desire intimacy far more often that the wives are willing to grant it. And today's modern women lay on conditions designed to make the paucity of intimacy the man's fault! "you're not being romantic enough!" is the usual accusation.

Fr. Rippiger remarked that Church doctrine teaches that if a spouse makes a reasonable request, to deny the "marriage debt" is a mortal sin. But this seems to have been swept under the rug in this age of  modernism.

As a young man on the airline, I remember hearing stories of the young married women getting together in their coffee klatches sharing with one another the excuses they used to deny their husbands intimacy and laughing about it!  Cruel! It reduces the marital relation to the man having to beg for intimacy like a little lap dog dancing on his back legs begging for a treat! Humiliating!  Being able to slip out and find  a sex robot would equalize the power situation here. And technically it would not be infidelity.

What women don't realize (or they don't care about) is that when you deny intimacy regularly, (my 2nd wife had us cut back to once every couple of months) the men grow cold and resentful! Then the wives complain their husbands aren't loving and attentive as they used to be and can't understand it: (which engenders the further denial of intimacy!)  It becomes a destructive spiral that destroys the marriage. That the divorce rate is so high is no accident!

There is a Satanic aspect to this: certainly Satan loves nothing better than to destroy Sacramental marriages. The best avenues to do so are in sex, money and children. Engendering coldness and resentment over intimate relations is a classic win for him.

Tuesday, December 4, 2018

HATRED AND DISCRIMINATION?

The Muslims whine and complain about "statements inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims". This is usually after an attack of Jihad that's taken innocent lives. Well, when you kill our citizens we don't like it (hatred?) and we don't want you around (discrimination?)!  This is not a baseless unwarranted "phobia"!  This is common sense! This is people's instinct for self-preservation kicking in!

The appalling aspect of all this is the Muslims NEVER mention the attacks: they play "victim" and say they are the injured party! They and their apologists in the media conjure "grave threats of backlash", few of which materialize, but may in fact be richly deserved!

The reality is: THE TRUTH IS NEVER HATE SPEECH! THE TRUTH DOES NOT INCITE HATRED AND DISCRIMINATION THAT'S NOT RICHLY DESERVED!

It is a public service to point out the misdeeds of the Muslim invaders in our midst! Time to hold them accountable!

Added comment: the reason that Islam seems to be the center of all these controversies is they threaten violence! No one bothers about "insults to Christianity" or any other faith!  The cowardly politicians cringe at the threats and basically exempt Muslims from the law.

Followers

Blog Archive

About Me