Thursday, August 16, 2012

Muslim Jihadists Starting Forest Fires in the West?

Of course, we at the Politically Correct Institute consider this no more than another slanderous insult to Islam and an example of hate and bigotry against Muslims! Here’s what we must do to atone:

1. Appoint a Muslim to head the Forest Service

2. Hire more Muslim firefighters

3. Forbid news coverage of forest fires from now on

Only in this way, can we reach out to Muslims and make them feel less insulted and a bigger part of the American community and to safeguard Muslims against the possibility of a backlash from right wing haters who have lost homes, livestock and property in these alleged conflegrations.

Medieval Jewish Blood Libel Alive and Well in Saudi Arabia

Our erstwhile “ally” !

Al Qaeda starting the fires in the West

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Welfare and “Community Organizers”of the Democratic Party

From a friend of mine in Pueblo, CO

Last week I was in the Rocky Mountain Eye Care Center in Pueblo for follow-up on my surgery.  Sitting next to me were two welfare queens I estimate in their mid 40's bragging about never paying for any medical services, even comparing how they scam the system.  In the conversation they discussed how phone calls from jails and prisons are always collect to the outside and the charge is $5.00 which I know is somewhat factual.
It now gets interesting.  One of them said her boyfriend who is in the county jail calls her every day and she takes the calls but does not pay the fee and gets away with it with the phone company because she is destitute as far as they are concerned.  She said the money is used on weed and partying at clubs and none of it would ever go to a Republican. 
She advised her welfare queen friend that she would again vote for Obama if for no other reason than she knew George Bush owns all the phones in jails and prisons and every call that is made makes him richer.  She also said that if Romney is elected he will be given the phones by Bush because that is the way Republicans do things. 
She said she was promised by a Democrat who visited her apartment complex funded by Section 8 money and spoke to residents that by re-electing Obama that would stop and the money would go to Democrats so they can be elected and take the property from rich people with jobs and give it to poor people who deserve better.
This is how the Democrat operatives from organizations like ACORN (think community organizers) do it.  I wonder if a Republican community organizer would be given equal access?


Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Deadly Night in Houla, (city on Syria)

This has to do with the persecution of Christians in Syria. There are 1.5 million Christians in Syria that will be butchered or driven from their homes by the Salafist rebels that Senator McCain wants to support.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Olympics Hope and Change

The Politically Correct Caucus announced today their demands for the 2016 Olympic Games.  “It is hurtful and unfair that some do not make the Olympic Teams but others do.  It is equally unfair and hurtful that Gold Medals are awarded to only one person in each event.”  The spokesperson went on to say: “such a system encourages excess effort and striving to do better than your neighbors, which is selfish and makes your friends look bad. These are not the community values we should be encouraging!”

the Politically Correct Caucus went on to put forth their demands:

  • That Olympic Teams be selected by National lottery, with no qualifications or restrictions. “This gives all people an equal chance and is the only fair way to do it” said the spokesperson.
  • That any training for the events be prohibited. “It would show individualism and lack of cooperation that is unhealthy” the spokesperson went on to say.
  • That events be demonstrations of cooperation and not unhealthy competition. “We envision  participants  holding hands and crossing the finish line together, singing ‘Kum Bah Yah’ rather than trying to best one another.  And of course everyone would get a gold medal! Is this not a better way?  It would be a change for the better, and each citizen would have hope of getting on an Olympic Team!”

Muslim Bigotry

Ahmed Bedier & ZJ Hafeez Promote Hate & Bigotry

Friday, August 3, 2012


The Fraud and Deception of “ChrIslam”

. John 10:10 says: “The thief comes to steal, kill and destroy”. Is this not an adequate description of a Bedouin raider society that preys on others? This enemy is an insidious, deceptive evil that is using our sense of common decency to destroy us. Islam attacks our society in ways such that they can accuse us of “forsaking our principals” if we seek to defend ourselves! (Satan is always the “accuser of the brethren”). The Muslims use the principle of “free speech” to destroy ours. They say “tolerance” means we have to tolerate their intolerance. Their “freedom of religion” means they have the right to deprive us of ours! So far, the self-loathing multiculturalists in our society agree with them!



This is a photograph taken in Feb 2012 in the Saddleback Church in Orange County, California, home to über-Pastor Rick Warren (Obama inauguration, Purpose Driven Life, etc.) who has joined forces with Southern California mosques to adopt a three-step plan for ‘ending enmity between evangelical Christians and Muslims[1]. It’s only fair to point out that 80% of the Mosques in the United States are controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood, whose motto is:

· “Allah is our objective,

· The Prophet is our leader,

· the Qur’an is our Law,

· Jihad is our Way,

· Dying in the Way of Allah our highest hope.”[2]

One question: is it the Holy Spirit or Muslim money the motivation? Theologically, the Muslims use the Zakat (Muslim Charity) for “THOSE WHOSE HEARTS ARE TO BE RECONCILED”[3]. (Translation: co-opting and buying off Western politicians and other leaders, such as Pastors!)

Obviously, Pastor Warren’s call to “consult texts we each call sacred in order to form a basis that allows us the privilege to serve the needs in our communities together”, as it says on the slide, is impossible if done honestly. All one has to do is exactly what they say: to consult the texts and verify the total incompatibility!


It is a counterfactual that Islam and Christianity are compatible To show this, we will l walk through the techniques and points that Muslims use to attack and “evangelize” Christians (“Da’wah). Then we will examine Christian doctrine and compare it with the Qur’an and Hadith.


Three concepts are used to approach Christians and Jews: Tawheed, Akhira and Prophethood/Guidance [4]

Tawheed: the oneness of God. The Muslims start by saying we all worships the same one God as a way to get their foot in the door. But eventually they will say it is “Shirk” (a grievous sin) to believe the dogma of the human-God Jesus as the son of God, or in the Trinity. Therefore, the Christian world cannot resolve its problems with Islam without complete submission to Allah and His Guidance.

Comment: where is the compatibility of Christianity and Islam here? Islamic doctrine has no provision for peaceful coexistence on the basis of equality with other religions. Bear in mind: “submission to Allah” in practical terms means submission to the Shari’ah and the arbitrary rule of the Sura Councils in the various Mosques! The consistent rule of law would disappear!

If you look at any Islamic country, what you see is an economic and civil rights basket case! Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan under the Taliban are perfect examples of what’s in store for mankind under “Allah’s Guidance”!

Akhira: the accountability to God. If we believe in the burning hell of Islam, then we will govern lives by fear of going there. We will have an incentive to “clean up our act”. Islamic apologists assure everyone this will eliminate the urge for sexual misconduct, selfishness, living within one’s means and will right all the wrongs of human society.

Comment: interestingly enough, the promise of 72 virgins in Paradise to encourage sex-starved teen age boys to martyr themselves in “Shaheed” operations seems to be the flip side! As the Marxists did during the cold war, the Muslims draw a comparison between a real Western society and their own theological utopian vision. Unsurprisingly, reality in the West falls woefully short. But to call for a comparison of the West to the miserable realities of existing Islamic societies is met with accusatory howls of “Bigotry”,” hate”, and “Islamophobia!”

Prophet hood/Guidance: All Prophets leave us with a code of conduct, such as Moses and his Ten Commandments or Jesus and his Sermon on the Mount. But the Muslims hold that the later prophets supersede previous ones! Thus, since Muhammad is “The Final Prophet”, he has superseded both Moses and Jesus! Mankind MUST follow the latest guidance brought by the last Messenger! (This is the ultimate aim of the “Abrahamic Initiative”). To quote Shamim Siddiqi: [5]

“It should be emphasized to the people of the land that man has lost the Guidance that was delivered in the form of the Torah and the Bible through human innovations and negligence. Hence, they have no choice but to accept the Qur’an as the only Guidance now available to mankind to follow.”

Comment: this is not what we believe as Christians. Jesus said:

Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the law until all is accomplished.”[6]

Bible scholars have long been aware of the linkage and interdependence of the Jewish Testament and the New Testament. Superscessionism has been thoroughly rejected.

Note that the Bible is filled with metaphors of sewing and reaping, and other agricultural images. The Qur’an, on the other hand, discusses the hatred of non-believers and how to treat slaves and captured booty. This should serve as a strong indicator of the incompatibility of Judeo-Christian traditions and Islam!



“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God”.[7]

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 17:

Sahih International: They have certainly disbelieved who say that Allah is Christ, the son of Mary. Say, "Then who could prevent Allah at all if He had intended to destroy Christ, the son of Mary, or his mother or everyone on the earth?" And to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and whatever is between them. He creates what He wills, and Allah is over all things competent.

Comment: the divinity of Jesus, the “Word made flesh” is incompatible with the distant and dominating Allah who “creates what He wills.”


The Crislam apologists say “Jesus is mentioned in the Qur’an”, as if this were sufficient to reconcile the two faiths. Let us take a closer look;

I believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible.

Do we worship the same God?
This is a key tenant of “ChrIslam: that “we worship the same God. If there are 1.2 billion Muslims out of a world population of 6 billion, then Muslims constitute roughly 20% of humanity. The Qur’an teaches that humanity is divided into believers and “the Kuffar” (hated non-believers). According to the Qur’an[9] and the Sunna, a “Kafir”[10] can be

· Mocked. Q83:34. On that day the faithful will mock the Kafirs, while they sit on bridal couches and watch them. Should not the kafirs be paid back for what they did?

· Punished: Q25:77. Say to the kafirs: My Lord does not care for you or your prayers. You have rejected the truth, so sooner or later, a punishment will come.

· Confused by Allah. Q6:25: Some among them listen to you [Muhammad], but We have cast veils over their [kafirs] hearts and heaviness to their ears so that they cannot understand our signs [the Koran].

· Plotted against. Q86:15. They plot and scheme against you [Muhammad], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the kafirs and leave them alone for awhile.

· Terrorized. Q8:12. Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!

· Deceived. Sahih Bukhari B5,59,369; Mohammed asked, “Who will kill Ka’b, the enemy of Allah and Mohammed?” Bin Maslama rose and responded, “O Mohammed! Would it please you if I killed him?” Mohammed answered, “Yes.” Bin Maslama then said, “Give me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plot will succeed.” Mohammed replied “You may speak falsely to him.”

· Annihilated: Q6:45. So the kafirs were annihilated. All praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds!

· Stolen from: Sahih Bukhari 5,59,537. On the day of Khaybar, Allah’s Apostle divided the spoils of war of Khaybar with the ratio of two shares for the horse and one share for the foot soldier.

· Killed: Q4:91. If they do not keep away from you or offer your peace or withdraw their hostilities, then seize them and kill them wherever they are. We give you complete authority over them.

· Crucified: Q5:33. The only reward for those who war against Allah and His messengers and strive to commit mischief on the earth is that they will be slain or crucified, have their alternate hands and feet cut off, or be banished from the land. This will be their disgrace in this world, and a great torment shall be theirs in the next except those who repent before you overpower them. Know that Allah is forgiving and merciful.

· Made war on, Q9:29.Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya], and they are humiliated.

· A Muslim is not a friend of the Kafir: Q3:28. Believers should not take kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah’s protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him.

· A kafir is ignorant: Q6:111: Even if We had sent down the angels to them [kafirs], the dead had spoken to them, and We had gathered all things before their eyes, they would not believe unless Allah had willed it, but most of them are ignorant.

· A kafir is blind: Q27:80: You can not make the dead listen or the deaf to hear, when they have turned to flee, nor can you guide the blind from their errors.

· A kafir is arrogant: Q40:76: Enter the gates of Hell to live there forever. Evil is the abode of the arrogant ones.

· A kafir is evil: Q23:97: And say: Oh my Lord! I seek refuge with you from the suggestions of the evil ones [kafirs]. And I seek refuge with you, my Lord, from their presence.

· A kafir is a liar: Q51:10: Cursed are the liars, who stumble along in the depths of ignorance!

· A kafir is disgraced: Q37:18: Tell them, “Yes! And you [kafirs] will be disgraced.”

· A kafir is a partner of Satan: Q25:55: And still they worship others besides Allah who can neither help nor hurt them. The kafir is Satan’s ally against Allah.

· A kafir is unclean: Q9:28: Oh, believers, only the kafirs are unclean.

· A kafir is cursed: Q33:60: They [kafirs] will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and murdered. It was Allah’s same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah’s ways.

Can we seriously believe that Allah, who apparently detests 80% of all humanity, is the same loving God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob who loves and cares for all his children? Remember this when “the guest Imam” asserts “The Qur’an speaks to all humanity”.

I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all ages, God from God, Light from Light, true God from True God, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father;

Chapter (18) sūrat l-kahf (The Cave) Verse 4

Yusuf Ali: Further, that He may warn those (also) who say, "Allah hath begotten a son”: (Note 2329)

Note 2329 The warning is not only needed for those who deny God or deny His Message, but also for those whose false ideas of God degrade religion in supposing that God begot a son, for God is One and is high above any ideas of physical reproduction.

Chapter (9) sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance) Verse 30[11]

Yusuf Ali: The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!

Comment: Either Jesus is the son of God, or he is not. These views are irreconcilable.

Through him all things were made. For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven, and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary, and became man.

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 17

Yusuf Ali: In blasphemy indeed are those that say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary. Say: "Who then hath the least power against Allah, if His will were to destroy Christ the son of Mary, his mother, and all every - one that is on the earth? For to Allah belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between. He createth what He pleaseth. For Allah hath power over all things."

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 72

Sahih International: They have certainly disbelieved who say, "Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary" while the Messiah has said, "O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Indeed, he who associates others with Allah – Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers.

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 75.
Abdullah Yusuf Ali: Christ, the son of Mary, was no more than an apostle; many were the apostles that passed away before him. His mother was a woman of truth. (Note 783) They had both to eat their (daily) food. See how God doth make his Signs clear to them; (Note 784) yet see in what ways they are deluded away from the truth!
Note 783 She never claimed that she was the mother of God, or that her son was God. She was a pious virtuous woman.
Note 784 Note how logically the argument has led up from Jewish back-slidings and want of faith , to blasphemies associated with the names of Jesus and Mary, and in the following verses to worship of senseless stocks and stones. God is one; His Message is one: yet how people’s perversity transforms truth into falsehood, religion into superstition!
Comment: either you believe God became incarnate through the Virgin Mary or you do not. Either you believe in the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus, or you do not. These views are irreconcilable.

For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered death and was buried, and rose again on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures.

Chapter (4) sūrat l-nisāa (The Women) Verse 157

Sahih International: And [for] their saying, "Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah." And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.

Comment: Christians believe in the crucifixion, death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. Muslims do not. These two views are incompatible and irreconcilable!

He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead and his kingdom will have no end.

From Da’wah Kitab al-Masahif Book 37, No 4310: (Referring to what Jesus will do when he comes again) “He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross kill swine and abolish Jizyah[12]. Allah will punish all religions except Islam. He will destroy the anti-Christ and will live on earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray over him.”

Comment: the eschatological view of Jesus’ return in Islam compared to the Christian view could not be more irreconcilable. For one thing, how could “his kingdom … have no end” if he is to die in forty years?

I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified, who has spoken through the prophets.

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 73

Sahih International: They have certainly disbelieved who say, "Allah is the third of three." And there is no god except one God. And if they do not desist from what they are saying, there will surely afflict the disbelievers among them a painful punishment.

Comment: Islam does not believe in the Trinity as do Christians. This is a major irreconcilable difference!

I believe in one, holy catholic and apostolic Church. I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen.

Chapter (1) sūrat l-fātiḥah (The Opening) Verses 6-7

Mohsin Khan: Guide us to the Straight Way: The Way of those on whom you have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).

Comment: This is a clear statement of Islamic Supremacy. The only way to “reconcile” with Islam is to submit. Islamic doctrine forbids and discounts any notion of dialogue on the basis of mutual respect and equality. Clearly, Islam and the Profession of Faith are neither compatible nor reconcilable.


“I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but by me.” [13]

Ecumenists blanch at the assertion “no one comes to the Father but by me”! It is so “non-inclusive and arrogant!” The assertion is politically incorrect to the self-loathing multiculturalists who strive for “Social Justice” and neglect the Gospel!

Sadly, too many churches have strayed from the Gospel of Jesus Christ. They preach a Marxist “social justice”, which seeks destruction of “the rich” and the redistribution of wealth as “salvation”. They appear to have accepted Science and rational thought as the final arbiter of truth. And since the “historical Jesus” can’t be verified “scientifically”, the Gospel must be “reinterpreted”. They see the crucifixion as “oppression of the working class”, “resurrection” as the coming of the “revolution”. The altar is adorned with an image of a bloody Christ toting an AK- 47 and bandoleers of ammunition!

In the hope of shoring up attendance, these churches have tried to make accommodation with the secular society by warping Biblical teachings to fit political correctness. “Tolerance and inclusivity” seem to be the cardinal virtues. Moral relativism and cultural equivalence has been the result. Thus, there is no longer any truth, nor are Judeo-Christian values any better than any others, nor is American society exceptional. Certainly, American society is nothing worth fighting for. All reality and truth become subjective: thus, “it may be evil for you, but not for me.” This has rendered many of today’s churches defenseless against this assault of Islam.


Returning to Da’wah: one approach to churches and synagogues is the so-called “Abrahamic Initiative”. It starts out by asserting that the three monotheistic religions sprung from Abraham, and all worship the same God (and we’ve dealt with that!). This Islamic concept implies that Islam has abrogated both Judaism and Christianity since Muhammad is indeed the “final Prophet”! It also asserts that the prophecies foretelling Muhammad’s coming were somehow suppressed, changed, or hidden in Jewish and Christian Scripture. Thus, all Jewish and Christian Scripture have been “corrupted”!

“Ibn Abbas said, ‘O Muslims? How do you ask the people of the Scriptures, though your Book (i.e. the Quran) which was revealed to His Prophet is the most recent information from Allah and you recite it, the Book that has not been distorted? Allah has revealed to you that the people of the scriptures have changed with their own hands what was revealed to them and they have said (as regards their changed Scriptures): This is from Allah, in order to get some worldly benefit thereby.’ Ibn Abbas added: ‘Isn't the knowledge revealed to you sufficient to prevent you from asking them? By Allah I have never seen any one of them asking (Muslims) about what has been revealed to you.’ “ [14]

The Muslims will say “Oh, we honor Jesus as you do,” but not as the Son of God, only a Muslim Prophet. As Siddiqi said: “Our call, which is against Shirk and against making the Prophet Jesus (God forbid!) as the son of God and believing in the Trinity, will be to God who is One, the Creator, the Lawgiver and the sustainer. God is the Supreme. The greatest crime in the sight of God is to ascribe partners to Him.”[15]

“IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”[16]

NOT to believe in Christ Jesus as the only Word of God made incarnate undermines the whole Christian faith! Here’s what the Church Fathers have to say in “Dominus Iesus” [17]:

9. In contemporary theological reflection there often emerges an approach to Jesus of Nazareth that considers him a particular, finite, historical figure, who reveals the divine not in an exclusive way, but in a way complementary with other revelatory and salvific figures. The Infinite, the Absolute, the Ultimate mystery of God would thus manifest itself to humanity in many ways and in many historical figures: Jesus of Nazareth would be one of these. More concretely, for some, Jesus would be one of the many faces which the Logos has assumed in the course of time to communicate with humanity in a salvific way.

Furthermore, to justify the universality of Christian salvation as well as the fact of religious pluralism, it has been proposed that there is an economy of the eternal Word that is valid also outside the Church and is unrelated to her, in addition to an economy of the incarnate Word. The first would have a greater universal value than the second, which is limited to Christians, though God’s presence would be more full in the second.

10. These theses are in profound conflict with the Christian faith. The doctrine of faith must be firmly believed which proclaims that Jesus of Nazareth, son of Mary, and he alone is the Son and the Word of the Father. The Word, which “was in the beginning with God” (Jn1:2) is the same as he who “became flesh” (Jn1:14). In Jesus, “the Christ the Son of the living God” (Mt 16:16), “the whole fullness of divinity dwells in bodily form” (Col2:9). He is the “only begotten Son of the Father, who is in the bosom of the Father” (Jn1:18), his “beloved Son, in whom we have redemption…In him the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him, God was pleased to reconcile all things to himself, on earth and in the heavens, making peace by the blood of his Cross” (Col1:13-14: 19-20)..”

“To introduce any sort of separation between the Word and Jesus Christ is contrary to the Christian faith….Jesus is the incarnate Word—a single and indivisible person…Christ is none other than Jesus of Nazareth; his is the Word of God made man for the salvation of all…In the process of discovering and appreciating the manifold gifts—especially the spiritual treasures—that God has bestowed on every people, we cannot separate those gifts from Jesus Christ, who is at the centre of God’s plan of salvation.”[18]

“And the word became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth; we have beheld his glory, glory as of the only son of the Father.”[19]

But from the Sira:[20]

“He knows what they intend and scheme and what comparison they seek to establish in their doctrine of Jesus when they make him God and Lord, when they possess the knowledge that he is nothing of the kind, thus behaving with insolence and infidelity. ‘He it is who forms you in the womb as He pleases,’ i.e. Jesus was one who was formed in the womb—they do not attempt to deny that—like every other child of Adam, so how can he be God when he had occupied such a place?”

The Divinity of Jesus Christ is a key to the Christian faith, a belief not shared by Islam. This renders Islam and Christianity hopelessly irreconcilable.


9 but as it is written, Things which eye saw not, and ear heard not, And which entered not into the heart of man, Whatsoever things God prepared for them that love him.[21]

But in the Qur’an:

Chapter (78) sūrat l-naba (The Great News) Verses 31-33

Sahih International: Indeed, for the righteous is attainment -Gardens and grapevines: And full-breasted [companions] of equal age.

Christian mystics may have reported their glimpses of heaven. But Sunni Islam assures a sexual smorgasbord of 72 virgins for its sex-starved teen-aged suicide bombers. A Muslim once told me: “We have no reason to stay on earth, but 72 reasons to go to heaven!”


Do to others as you would have them do to you.[22]

The Qur’anic response:

Chapter (4) sūrat l-nisāa (The Women) Verse 34

Sahih International: Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever exalted and grand.

It’s clear from this passage that there is no “Golden Rule” in Islam: beating disobedient wives as well as the treatment of the disbelieving “Kafir” mentioned above make this clear. Islamic Law differentiates between men and women, disbelievers and believers, another fact that makes Islam incompatible with Western Civilization.


“You shall not kill.”[23]

The Qur’anic concept:

Chapter (9) sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance) Verse 5

Sahih International: And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

Chapter (9) sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance) Verse 29

Sahih International: Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

Chapter (2) sūrat l-baqarah (The Cow) Verse 191

Sahih International: And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- îaram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

These Ayats (verses) make clear that Islam does not consider the lives of non-believers as sacred or valuable, another aspect of Islam that Pastor Warren may have a hard time selling to his congregation.

“You shall not commit adultery”[24]

Chapter (4) sūrat l-nisāa (The Women) Verse 3

Sahih International: And if you fear that you will not deal justly with the orphan girls, then marry those that please you of [other] women, two or three or four. But if you fear that you will not be just, then [marry only] one or those your right hand possesses.[25] That is more suitable that you may not incline [to injustice].


Sahih Bkukhari Volume 8, Book 77, Number 600 :[26]

Narrated by Abu Said Al-Khudri

That while he was sitting with the Prophet a man from the Ansar came and said, "O Allah's Apostle! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?" Allah's Apostle said, "Do you do that? It is better for you not to do it, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created."

Comment: the Christian ideal of a sacramental marriage between one man and one woman is completely incompatible with up to four wives permitted in Islam, to say nothing of sex with slave girls, or “those your right hand possesses”. It places Western nations at risk when they admit polygamous Muslim immigrants who consider themselves engaged in long term demographic “Civilizational Jihad”.

“You shall not steal”[27]

Anwar al Awlaki said: “The greatest form of income is that of the spoils of war and the greatest profession is being a soldier in the path of Allah. The income generated from booty taken by force from the enemies of Allah is purer and more virtuous than income generated from being a businessman, and engineer, a physician, or a farmer, simply because that was the source of income that Allah destined for his Messenger Muhammad.”[28]

Comment: too many well intentioned people and organizations in the West believe that “violence is caused by poverty.” They delude themselves by thinking that If we would just provide education and opportunity to the Muslims, somehow the violence would stop[29]. Such a view ignores the reality of the Islamic doctrine of Jihad and the Qur’anic mandate for all Muslims to participate. One only need recall the Jihad attack in the summer of 2007 at the Glasgow Airport in the UK, conducted by Muslim National Health physicians! Physicians are in no way uneducated, marginalized or poverty stricken! Yet the apologists classified the attack as “a paradox” and dismissed it.

“You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor”[30]


Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 49, Number 857 :

Narrated by Um Kulthum bint Uqba

That That she heard Allah's Apostle saying, "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."

Sahih Muslim No. 6303[31]

Humaid b. 'Abd al-Rahman b. 'Auf reported that his mother Umm Kulthum daughter of 'Uqba b. Abu Mu'ait, and she was one amongst the first emigrants who pledged allegiance to Allaah's Prophet (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam), as saying that she heard Allaah's Messenger (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) as saying: A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good. Ibn Shihab said he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).

Reliance of the Traveller §r8.2 PERMISSIBLE LYING

“When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory.”

Comment: these verses are well known to every Muslim, and define the concept of “Taqqiya”, or “Sacred Deception” which can and must be used to protect the Muslim or Islam itself. Ironically, I witnessed Ali Hasan, a former candidate for Colorado State Treasurer, absolutely deny any knowledge of this concept! Was this not a perfect example of “Taqqiya”?


The Muslims also will say “We honor Mary” as a pitch for their “Da’wah”,[32] especially to Hispanics, whose devotion to Mary is strong. But as we have seen in the above verses, Mary is NOT the Mother of God, although virtuous.


"When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some doubted. And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, 'All authority has been given to me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.' Amen."


Chapter (8) sūrat l-anfāl (The Spoils of War) Verse 39

Sahih International: And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease - then indeed, Allah is seeing of what they do.

Chapter (2) sūrat l-baqarah (The Cow) Verse 193

Sahih International: Fight them until there is no [more] fitnah and [until] worship is [acknowledged to be] for Allah. But if they cease, then there is to be no aggression except against the oppressors.

Chapter (9) sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance) Verse 111

Sahih International: Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.

Comment: the Great Commission urges the disciples to preach the Gospel and make disciples of all the nations. Islam, on the other hand, views the earth and everything therein as the rightful property of Allah. The believer’s duty, therefore, is to wrest the earth from its present non-Muslim holders and “restore” it to Allah by eternal Jihad!


But what will be the “enemy”[34] response to these comparisons? One will be “citations at 10 paces”, hurled back and forth! But not all citations are equal! A key concept that Westerners must understand is abrogation.


As Muhammad received his so-called “revelations”, people began to realize that his later “revelations” conflicted with his earlier ones. To respond to this criticism, the following Ayats (verses) were “revealed”:

مَا نَنْسَخْ مِنْ آَيَةٍ أَوْ نُنْسِهَا نَأْتِ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْهَا أَوْ مِثْلِهَا أَلَمْ تَعْلَمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ عَلَى كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ ﴿2:106Q﴾

(Q2:106) We bring a better verse or at least the like of it for whatever we abrogate or cause it to be forgotten.[35]

Chapter (16) sūrat l-naḥl (The Bees) Verse 101;

Sahih International: And when We substitute a verse in place of a verse - and Allah is most knowing of what He sends down - they say, "You, [O Muhammad], are but an inventor [of lies]." But most of them do not know.

Chapter (13) sūrat l-raʿd (The Thunder) Verse 39:

Sahih International: Allah eliminates what He wills or confirms, and with Him is the Mother of the Book.

Comment: These verses mean that the later revelations supersede the earlier ones. Usually, the Muslim apologists, (such as Pastor Warren?), will quote abrogated Meccan Suras (Chapters) to convince the congregation and the world that Islam and Christianity are compatible.

Islamic apologists also try to deny that Abrogation exists. They will assert that certain passages of the Qur’an were valid at certain periods of time and not at others. But this is contrary to the Scholarly Consensus (Ijma) that the Qur’an is eternal and unchangeable!


To determine Sura precedence, one must know the Chronological Order of the “Revelations”. The order is well known to every Muslim but obscured in the West by the Muslims and their apologists. Here it is:

The chronological order is from top to bottom, then left to right. Thus, Sura 96 is the first and Sura 5 the last. Suras 9 and 5 are last chronologically, and “Abrogate” (has precedence over) the earlier Suras. Thus, if Pastor Warren quotes an early Sura as “proof” that Islam and Christianity are compatible, chances are it’s been abrogated by a later Medina Sura. Scholars say that Q9:5 and Q9:29 abrogated hundreds of earlier “conciliatory” Meccan Ayats and Suras.

COMBATTING “ISLAMOPHOBIA”: (The OIC’s campaign to criminalize any criticism of Islam)

Here is a document from a 2006 OIC[36] meeting:







5-6 DHUL QA'ADAH 1426H

(7-8 DECEMBER 2005)

The Conference underlined the need to collectively endeavor to reflect the noble Islamic values, counter Islamophobia, defamation of Islam and its values and desecration of Islamic holy sites, and to effectively coordinate with States as well as regional and international institutions and organizations to urge them to criminalize this phenomenon as a form of racism.

The Conference expressed its concern at rising hatred against Islam and Muslims and condemned the recent incident of desecration of the image of the Holy Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) in the media of certain countries and stressed the responsibility of all governments to ensure full respect of all religions and religious symbols and the inapplicability of using the freedom of expression as a pretext to defame religions.


(a) Everyone shall have the right to express his opinion freely in such manner as would not be contrary to the principles of the Shari'ah.

Comment: note here how they are trying to cash in on the Post Modern “Political Correctness” by trying to label “Islamophobia” as a “form of racism”. But Islam is a belief attribute, not a biological one. The purpose of this OIC effort is to disarm the West in the war of ideas by imposing the Shari’ah definition of slander on Western law.

Notice also how they dismiss freedom of speech, one of our cherished liberties, merely as a “pretext to defame religions”. The key here is to understand that “defame”, “insult”, “denigrate” or any other term all fall under the rubric of “slander”.

In the West, “slander” means damaging someone’s reputation by lying. Truth is an absolute defense against charges of slander. But under the Shari’ah, “slander” merely means “saying something about Islam they don’t like” or “revealing something about Islam they don’t wish to be revealed”[37] Muslims are NOT quick to make the distinction or end the confusion, since it serves them well. Even our conservative talk show hosts have failed to pick up on this. I listened to Mike Gallagher one afternoon saying how “we really shouldn’t slander other people’s religion” while discussing this subject. I tried to call in to enlighten him, but was unable to get through.


Another aspect is the “Duality” of Islamic belief. This is the most difficult concept for the Western mind to wrap around. We have talked about “ABROGATION” and how the later Suras and Ayats (Chapters and verses) supersede the earlier ones. But since Allah revealed both, they must both be true even if they are contradictory. The first Ayat (verse) may say something is black, and the later Ayat may say it’s white. In Islamic thought it can be BOTH! Muslims can and do roll out either Ayat as the situation dictates! This is why Muslims can say the attacks on Sept 11, 2001 weren’t the “real Islam” and that Islam is “the Religion of Peace”. Yet Al Qaeda interprets Qur'anic verses in accordance with mainstream scholarly consensus!
But the noted Christian writer C.S. Lewis brings us back to common sense:
“It remains true that all things are possible with God: the intrinsic impossibilities are not things but nonentities. It is no more possible for God than for the weakest of His creatures to carry out both of two mutually exclusive alternatives; not because His power meets an obstacle, but because nonsense remains nonsense even when we talk it about God.”[38]


As Christians, we are called to “reach out in Love to all, since we’re all brothers and sisters in the eyes of God”. But we must do this “reaching out” on the basis of truth with our eyes open. It’s important to understand how Islam views us, and behave intelligently: “Wise as serpents and harmless as doves” as Scripture says. Sayyid Qutb, the noted Islamic political theoretician had some key things to say about “Ecumenism”:

“The chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyahh[39] is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but that only so that the people of Jahiliyyahh may come over to Islam,”[40]

This means that all “outreach” is basically one way Islamic subversion. And the Muslims talk constantly about “bridges”. Understand that hey mean Sayyid Qutb’s bridge!

In a conversation with a Pastor on this subject, he was bursting with pride that he’d had ecumenical events with Muslims for years! “The Imam speaks at our church regularly!” he said. I asked him “how many times have you spoken at a Mosque during their Friday prayers?” I got only puzzled silence! The answer of course was ZERO! Muslims don’t pray with “polytheists” (as those who believe in the Trinity are labeled). To do so would be “shirk”, or a grievous sin! It would be enlightening to this Pastor were he to politely insist that HE speak at the Mosque before the Imam could come back to his church. The squirming, prevaricating and excuses would be a sight to behold! And if the Pastor really insisted, eventually the accusations of “bigotry, hate, and Islamophobia” would soon follow!


At the Presidential Inaugural in January 2009 there was a huge service at the Washington Cathedral. All the high ranking clergy were there: Bishops and Rabbis abounded. The Muslims sent Ingrid Mattson, the then President of ISNA. She was the only one not ordained in attendance. But here are just two of many ahadith that reveal the Islamic doctrine:

“One of the things for which Allaah has singled out men is the acts of worship which require physical strength, such as Jihad, or require a position of leadership such as leading the prayers, etc., are only for men, and women have nothing to do with them.”[41]

“According to the actions of Muslims throughout fourteen hundred years, no woman should be allowed to lead men in prayer.”[42]

Thus, all the Archbishops and Pastors equal only an unordained woman in Muslim eyes. It isn’t hard to grasp the insult. But ignorance is apparently bliss. No one grasped the significance (except the 1.2 billion Muslims), which leads to the next observation:


Chapter (3) sūrat āl ʿim'rān (The Family of Imrān) Verse 110

Yusuf Ali: Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book had faith, it were best for them: among them are some who have faith, but most of them are perverted transgressors.

Comment: If we continue to persist in our ignorance and stupidity concerning Islamic doctrine and in dealing with Islamic Jihad, and continually allow ourselves to be deceived, remaining in our willful blindness, it’s hard not to agree! Nor does it bode well for our survival.


Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) verse 14

Verse 5:14. Sahih International: And from those who say, "We are Christians" We took their covenant; but they forgot a portion of that of which they were reminded. So We caused among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection. And Allah is going to inform them about what they used to do.

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 33.

Sahih International: Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 51.

Sahih International: O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you – then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people.

Comment: the above bedrock Ayats concerning Christians and Jews cannot be ignored, as much as many Pastors and clergy would like to do so. The smooth talking apologists and Imams in America will soft-sell these verses by saying things like “oh, these are old time verses no one believes anymore” or some such. But look at the treatment of the Copts in Egypt or the Christians in Nigeria, countries where Islam is dominant. Do you think they will treat us (or our grandchildren) any differently if they become powerful here?


We’ve looked briefly at ChrIslam, and it fits nicely with the Muslim Brotherhood’s “General Strategic Goal” of taking down our nation by subverting the churches. The short answer is the Muslim Brotherhood is behind “ChrIslam”, and it’s a part of their plan to undermine our culture and civilization and replace it with an Islamic state. There are other aspects of this subversion besides ChrIslam, but that’s beyond the scope of this paper.

This plan is revealed in a document titled “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America.”[43] The document is only 18 pages, read it at your leisure. The important thing to remember is this: it was written in 1991, captured in 2004, and used as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial in 2008. In the trial, the Muslim defense stipulated this document, meaning they did not dispute its authenticity, nor the veracity of its content.

We’ve briefly covered the difficult Islamic concepts. Abrogation: whereby later verses “abrogate" earlier ones. Islamophobia”: a phony word devised by British Muslims in the 1980’s. It would have you believe that concern about Islam is irrational bigotry. But it’s designed to criminalize criticism of Islam. Duality: a word which refers to the double meanings in Islam. They have two messages: one for their own in the Mosques and another for “the Kuffar”. To expose the deception it to incur howls of “Islamophobia and bigotry!”

We looked at ecumenism and the possibility of reconciliation. We have to face that the Muslim worldview is very different than ours. I remember President Bush saying “I think Palestinian moms want their children to grow up in peace just like American moms want their children to grow up in peace.”[44] Yet there’s overwhelming evidence of the use of child suicide bombers throughout the Middle East[45] in which Muslim parents take pride! (And there’s this: Muslim families have on average five children, as opposed to less than two in the West. A Muslim family can contribute a child or two to “Shaheed” operations and never miss them. Whereas, when the professional Manhattan working single mom loses her designer son in Afghanistan, it’s an irreplaceable catastrophe!!

We’ve compared some key Bible verses with the Qur’an and showed that most of them are hopelessly incompatible, especially concerning the resurrection and the Trinity. Theologically Jesus was merely a prophet of Islam, subordinate to Muhammad. He was not the son of God, and was not crucified and rose again. When he returns, he will slay all non-believers and establish Islam, (probably not the second coming most Christians have in mind).

Let us review the term “Da’wah”. It is crucial here. It is the Muslim invitation to embrace Islam. But its ugly twin sister is Jihad, a fact the Muslims intentionally do not share. Non-believers are always invited to Islam before they are attacked. If the non-believers fail to accept the invitation, then their blood is licit. The non-believers then become the target of Jihad. And so it will be in the United States. Eventually, the violent Jihad will come, with daily attacks throughout the land. This is doctrinal. (See Q9:111)

One is forced to conclude that the real function of “ChrIslam” is to engineer and justify some sort of face-saving submission to Islam by a pacifist clergy hoping to avoid the inevitable violent Jihad.





[1] <> Accessed 25 Mar 2012

[2] Written in Arabic around the edge of the Muslim Brotherhood Logo (See Appendix 1) page 27

[3] “Reliance of the Traveller” h8.14(1), Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Masri, translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller, Amana Publications Beltsville, MD 1991 page 270

[4] “Methodology of Da’wah” by Shammim A. Siddiqi, FORUM FOR ISLAMIC WORK, Brooklyn NY 11217, 1989, pages 85 - 87

[5] Ibid, page 87

[6] Matt 5:17-18, RSV

[7] John 1:1-2

[8] Taken from the “Magnificat", Holy Week, Vol 14, No. 1 page 263

[9] Qur’an selections taken from “A Self-Study Course on Political Islam” CPSI, LLC, 2008, pages 3-87 to 3-89

[10] A hated unbeliever. This is NOT a neutral term! This is a vicious insult!

[11] Qur’anic references from <> Accessed March 2012

[12] Note that to “abolish Jizya” means non-Muslims will no longer have the option to pay the annual poll tax (the jizyah) to preserve their lives by “buying their head” for another year! They will only have the choice either to convert or to die!

[13] John 14:6, RSV

[14] B3,48,850 <> Accessed March 2012

[15] “Methodology of Da’wah” Shamim A. Siddiqi, The Forum for Islamic Work, Brooklyn NY 11217, 1989, page 85

[16] John 1:1, RSV

[18] “Dominus Iesus” on the Unicity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church , Holy See, Vatican Aug 6, 2000, pages 5- 6.

[19] John 14:14, RSV

[20] “The Life of Muhammad” Ibn Ishaq, translated by A. Guillaume, Oxford University Press, NY, 1955, §404 page 272

[21] 1 Corinthians 2:9

American Standard Version (ASV)

[22] Luke 6:31 NIV

[23] Ex: 20:13 RSV

[24] Ex 20:14, RSV

[25] Note: the phrase “those your right hand possesses” refers to slave girls. Another interesting concept that if a woman is captured, under Islamic Law her marriage is considered null and void, making her immediately eligible for sexual abuse by her Muslim captors, (although I cannot find the Qur’anic Citation or the hadith).

[26]<> Accessed 26 April, 2012. The question here had to do with whether or not Muhammad’s men should rape their captive slave girls, because if they were pregnant, they would be worth less on the slave markets.

[27] Ex 20:15 RSV

[28] “inspire” Winter 1431| 2010 page 55.

[29] Deepak Chopra called for a “Muslim Marshall Plan” after the Mumbai attacks in November 2009, based on this misperception. As if billions in oil revenues already going to Islamic countries could not be used for education and infrastructure instead of Jihad!

[30] Ex 20: 17 RSV


[32] The Muslim word for the invitation to Islam: their proslytization. But the difference from the Christian version is the ugly twin sister of Da’wah: Jihad! If you do NOT accept the invitation, Muslims will war against you to force your submission to the Shari’ah.

[33] Matt 28: 17-20 RSV

[34] Yes I use the term “enemy”. Again, the apologists blanch, and bend over backwards to assure Muslims we are NOT at war with them! In the Progressive worldview, there is no truth, right or wrong, nor an enemy: only “misunderstanding” that can be resolved with “dialogue”. But it takes “two to tango”, so to speak! And there’s this: Muslims define “war against Islam” as merely resisting the Islamization process! Qur’anically, the only peace possible with Islam is submission!

[35]<> Accessed 26 March 2012

[36] IOC: the “Organization of the Islamic Cooperation”, and organization of 57 Islamic States, which is the largest voting bloc in the United Nations

[37] See “Reliance of the Traveller” § r2.2, r 3.1. See footnote 3

[38] “The Problem of Pain” C.S. Lewis, Harper One, 10 E. 53rd, NY, NY 10022. 2001, page 18

[39] Jahilliyyahh is defined as “ignorant society”. Initially, pre-Islamic Arabian societies, but in Sayyid Qutb’s meaning today, any non-Islamic society.

[40] “Milestones” Sayyid Qutb, Maktbah Booksellers and Publishers, Birmingham England © 2006 Page 156

[41]Modern Day Trojan Horse” ,Solomon & E Al Maqdisi,ANM Publishers, Charlottesville VA 2009 page 104

[42] Badaa’i, 2/289

[43] <>Accessed 26 March 2012



Thursday, August 2, 2012


It’s clear there will be no recovery under the present administration. They are ideologically prohibited from doing what’s needed.

The problem is a debt implosion: high levels of debt have people concerned. As a consequence, businesses and banks are hording cash, families are saving and paying off debt. So cash in the system is NOT the problem!

Yet what do the Morons in the Administration think? Um, duh, a recession. All we need to do is “prime the pump” with more government borrowing and spending”. But this is EXACTLY the wrong thing to do! More debt creates more fear and makes things worse!

None of this addresses the Marxist anti-business attitude of the administration. A banner ad for the Obama campaign announced “Obama will punish Big Oil”. This is Progressive emotion and illogic, not what the economy needs. But what needs to be explored is the motives of the administration in the first place.

What the administration really desires is 51% of the voting population on government assistance. Then, the administration can use the plurality to fleece the other 49% by continually voting themselves more benefits. It will be done in the name of “the rich paying their fair share”.  (but the top  1% pay 39% of the Federal income tax already, and the bottom 40% pay nothing! Is this not already more than a “fair share”?)

The flawed assumption here is that wealth formation can be taken for granted. This is not factual. Should such a scheme be instituted, the economy will contract at an accelerated pace, making everyone poorer! In fact, the only set point for “equality” is everyone at the subsistence level!  But as Alinsky said: “we’d rather rule in hell than serve in heaven”. This is a perfect example!

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Chick Fil A Appreciation Day, Aug 1, 2012

Here we are, on a sleepy Wednesday afternoon, and the Chick Fil Aimage is Jammed! The cars for the drive through are lined up around the block! The line at the counter is 20 deep and there isn’t a seat vacant in the whole restaurant! Why? Solidarity for the CEO of Chick Fil A who had the temerity to say that he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman! “ Mike Huckabee declared today “Chick Fil A Appreciation Day” and the support has been overwhelming!

The Alinksyite slam was to extrapolate and twist the CEO’s statement into “hate” for homosexuals! Mayor Rahm of Chicago accused Chick Fil A of not embracing “Chicago Values”: values like what, Mr. Mayor? Gang violence and drug dealing? Soaring illegitimacy, career welfareism? corruption and a murder rate unequaled since the days of Al Capone? You’re right, Mr. Mayor: we don’t embrace such values.

Of course I’m told that to mention such things might “offend” some of our more “liberal” colleagues. Let’s see: weren’t they the same ones who said that the “Piss Christ”, a beaker filled with urine with a crucifix resting in it, was “art”, and if we took offense, “ that’s your problem, so live with it”? And didn’t these same Liberals say the same thing about the Elephant Dung Virgin Mary at the Tate Gallery in London?

So now you’re saying we can’t mention “marriage should be between one man and one woman” because you say it’s “offensive”? Sorry, I don’t think so! Free speech is free speech, and not just for the Left. Not offending someone is no requirement! And don’t tell me it’s “hate speech” or “creating a hostile environment” to call out your Liberal hypocrisy.


Blog Archive

About Me