Monday, December 24, 2012

Fiscal Cliff

Part of the Progressive-Marxist agenda is to gut our military and raise taxes sufficiently to wipe out the middle class. Obama and his minions can move towards this goal by doing nothing and letting the “fiscal cliff” work for them. There is no incentive for Obama to prevent this.

Also, they will blame Republicans for the resulting damage to the economy. To people with liberal educations and up from the NGO’s, the concept of “taxing the rich” to help the economy sounds reasonable, having an “economics free background” as most of them do.

Republican leadership is entirely outclassed. They don’t understand that machine politics is independent of the economy. Democrat Machine politicians in Chicago win regardless of what the economy does. The Democrats are merely planning to take the Chicago machine national.

The Republican leadership is still floundering, talking about “returning to the values of 1776” or “fiscal responsibility and currency parities” which mean nothing to the inner city Blacks who vote on the basis of “da bros gotta stick tageddah”.  Forget it.  Responsible government is a thing of the past. American greatness will disappear over the next 20 years of Marxist rule.

Also: racism is rampant. Marxist ideology states “only the dominant group can be racist”. In other words, racism practiced by the Holder Justice Dept or Jessie Jackson is NOT racism, but an “expression of ethnic identity”.  But if white people did the same thing, they’d be jailed!

Either white people go to the chopping block quietly, or they start a civil war. Hard to see any other scenarios. This, of course, is why Obama and his administration are striving so mightily to disarm white people. They know this full well. They prefer our “going to the chopping block quietly”.

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Newtown Connecticut School Shooting

Twenty children were shot and the whole nation is going bananas: yet Planned Parenthood kills 300,000 children a year and no one says a word! Where is the sense of national  priority here?

The Democrats are “vowing action on gun control”, (as if the dozens of gun control laws in New Jersey and Connecticut already on the books weren’t the most restrictive in the nation,for all the good they do)!

The bills will be signed in the Oval Office with the weeping families of shooting victims in attendance. The concluding remarks will imply “we’re finally doing something about the gun violence in this nation”…..until the next shooting takes place!

The hypocrisy of most gun control legislation is that it only applies to law abiding owners of firearms who are NOT the ones who commit crimes. These laws basically disarm the law abiding citizens, making them more vulnerable to criminals with illegal firearms who could care less about the little signs that say “this establishment is a gun free zone”.

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Picketing the Aurora CO Planned Parenthood


District Deputy and the Color Corps Commander carrying the Banner


Crosses and an “Abortion Kills” sign on sidewalk



Trunk Display



signage and flags on vehicle across from Planned Parenthood

Thursday, December 13, 2012

How Government will seize the housing stock in the United States

If you have a home, savings, and an IRA, it will soon be deemed “unfair” when “so many have so little!” The mantra is “think of the Poor!”

A Federal mandate to provide “adequate housing for the less fortunate” will befall local governments. Property taxes and bond issues will be raised to build projects strategically in different precincts designed to disenfranchise home owners. As this is accomplished, property taxes will be raised mercilessly. It will be a transfer of wealth from the home owning American middle class to the indigent illegal immigrants (who vote Democratic, of course).

If your property tax is $4500 a year, let’s say, it would go to $25,000 a year. After all, it’s only “fair”! Inexorably, as people are unable to keep up the tax payments and the market for housing disappears, (who can afford such taxes?) the property escheats to the Cities and counties, or to a soon to be established Federal entity to manage housing.

Big houses will be cut into apartments, but the really nice ones will be retained by the public sector entities to house their officials. High salaries would be “unfair”, but perks that go with the job can be acceptable.

Thus, the big homes that used to belong to business executives now belong to more and more local officials, such as mayors, police chiefs, and County Commissioners. All the landscaping, maintenance, even house cleaning will be performed by public employees.

As for you: now that you’ve lost your home, you can only apply to the Housing Authority for a place to live. If you’re lucky, you’ll get a basement apartment with running water. If you want to get on the three year waiting list for a two bedroom apartment, you will have to make a “nice contribution” to the local official’s re-election campaign. Remember: the administrator’s re-appointment to his post depends on the amount he can garner from the tenants of the projects for which he is held responsible.  The only option for young single women is “be nice to the administrator, and maybe he’ll be nice to you!”

Is this the “fair shot at a home of your own! This is our country now!”?

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Satan's Music in Cairo

Thursday, November 29, 2012

The rape of Europe by Muslim parasites

The German author Henryk M. Broder recently told the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant (12 October) that young Europeans who love freedom, better emigrate. Europe as we know it will no longer exist 20 years from now. Whilst sitting on a terrace in Berlin, Broder pointed to the other customers and the passers-by and said melancholically: “We are watching the world of yesterday.”

Europe is turning Muslim. As Broder is sixty years old he is not going to emigrate himself. “I am too old,” he said. However, he urged young people to get out and “move to Australia or New Zealand. That is the only option they have if they want to avoid the plagues that will turn the old continent uninhabitable.”

Many Germans and Dutch, apparently, did not wait for Broder’s advice. The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and Germany has already surpassed the number of immigrants moving in. One does not have to be prophetic to predict, like Henryk Broder, that Europe is becoming Islamic. Just consider the demographics. The number of Muslims in contemporary Europe is estimated to be 50 million. It is expected to double in twenty years. By 2025, one third of all European children will be born to Muslim families. Today Mohammed is already the most popular name for new-born boys in Brussels, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and other major European cities.

Broder is convinced that the Europeans are not willing to oppose islamization. “The dominant ethos,” he told De Volkskrant, “is perfectly voiced by the stupid blonde woman author with whom I recently debated. She said that it is sometimes better to let yourself be raped than to risk serious injuries while resisting. She said it is sometimes better to avoid fighting than run the risk of death.”

In a recent op-ed piece in the Brussels newspaper De Standaard (23 October) the Dutch (gay and self-declared “humanist”) author Oscar Van den Boogaardrefers to Broder’s interview. Van den Boogaard says that to him coping with the islamization of Europe is like “a process of mourning.” He is overwhelmed by a “feeling of sadness.” “I am not a warrior,” he says, “but who is? I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it.”

As Tom Bethell wrote in this month’s American Spectator: “Just at the most basic level of demography the secular-humanist option is not working.” But there is more to it than the fact that non-religious people tend not to have as many children as religious people, because many of them prefer to “enjoy” freedom rather than renounce it for the sake of children. Secularists, it seems to me, are also less keen on fighting. Since they do not believe in an afterlife, this life is the only thing they have to lose. Hence they will rather accept submission than fight. Like the German feminist Broder referred to, they prefer to be raped than to resist.

“If faith collapses, civilization goes with it,” says Bethell. That is the real cause of the closing of civilization in Europe. Islamization is simply the consequence. The very word Islam means “submission” and the secularists have submitted already. Many Europeans have already become Muslims, though they do not realize it or do not want to admit it.

Some of the people I meet in the U.S. are particularly worried about the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe. They are correct when they fear that anti-Semitism is also on the rise among non-immigrant Europeans. The latter hate people with a fighting spirit. Contemporary anti-Semitism in Europe (at least when coming from native Europeans) is related to anti-Americanism. People who are not prepared to resist and are eager to submit, hate others who do not want to submit and are prepared to fight. They hate them because they are afraid that the latter will endanger their lives as well. In their view everyone must submit.

This is why they have come to hate Israel and America so much, and the small band of European “islamophobes” who dare to talk about what they see happening around them. West Europeans have to choose between submission (islam) or death. I fear, like Broder, that they have chosen submission – just like in former days when they preferred to be red rather than dead.

New Leather Jacket

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Stalin’s Secret Police

The Position of Counter Jihad in the West

"Dictators like Hitler, Stalin an d Idi Amin (and I would add Left wing mainstream academia and the media) do not want people to be free to say what they think, or to value their own experience. They enslave people in fear, silence and in ideology, and oblige them to speak and live according to the party line. (These days, it's called 'political correctness').

Dictators (along with the Democratic National Committee) use lies, propaganda and secret police to maintain their power and contol  over people and to prevent them from thinking and speaking the truth. (A large part of the big lie is that there is no truth! That that everything is subjective: that 'it may be true for you, but not for me!')

Throughout history, however, man and women have stood up to abusive power without fear of the consequences. They spoke the truth to those in power who did not want to hear it. These men and women were not slaves, they were free. Many of them were imprisoned and put to death because they spoke out.

"Drawn into the Mystery of Jesus Through the Gospel of John", Jean Vanier, Paulist Press, NY 2004, pps 158-159

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Why the US is going “down the drain”…

The Democrat slogan is “A society of shared wealth”.   The problem with this is the assumption that wealth creation can be taken for granted: it can’t! It will shrink!

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Father of former Navy Seal killed in Benghazi

Profetens Ummah Oslo

Obama on the Libya attack

The reason the Obama Administration continued to stick to the “video is at fault” scenario long after everyone knew it wasn’t true, was that he was sticking to the Muslim Brotherhood playbook!  Even as we speak, the Jihadi and Middle Eastern websites are still referring to the “Islamophobe video” and the “necessity for blasphemy laws in the West to preserve world peace”.

The whole attack in Libya was part of the OIC’s ten year strategy to “combat Islamophobia”. The “Istanbul Process” is the implementation of UN Resolution 16/18 to criminalize “denigrating someone’s religion”. It is a Resolution to which Secretary of State Clinton agreed! She said she will use “shame and peer pressure” to get the United States to adopt this UN Resolution. Note carefully she is not using the Courts because she knows the Resolution runs counter to our Constitution.

Thus, BOTH the President and his Secretary of State have violated their oath of office to “uphold and defend the Constitution” by trying to impose this UN Resolution.

Note carefully that “denigrating someone’s religion” will only be applied to Islam, ( since it is the “only true religion”, this does not preclude the Muslims criticizing Christians and Jews). But “denigrating”, “insulting” all boil down to the Shari’a definition of “slander”, which only  means “saying something the Muslims don’t like” or “revealing something about Islam they don’t want revealed”.  The net effect of such a blasphemy law is not to keep people from saying uncomplimentary things about Islam, but to keep people from discussing Islam AT ALL! In other words, it wants to make Islam untouchable in the market place of free ideas, rendering us intellectually defenseless!  This is an outrage!

Monday, October 22, 2012

The President trying to please his base .


New Declaration of Independence

American version of the French “Generation Identitaire”

Bat Ye'or on Eurabia

Bat Ye'or om Västerlandets undergång (1)

Franska Gallia Watch har intervjuat den
om Västerlandets kommande undergång.
Intervjun har översatts till engelska och
presenteras i två avsnitt:
"After the greetings, Christine asks her to explain Eurabia:
I didn't invent the term. It was the title of a journal that foreshadowed the situation today. Eurabia is an ideology that seeks to promote the fusion of the two shores of the Mediterranean and to eradicate the identity of the European peoples. Eurabia is two combats. One is the desire of the European Union to extend its power. When I speak of the European Union, I mean a whole system of functionaries who aim to abolish the European nations in order to construct a European Empire. This is an absurdity because this empire contains several languages, several histories, several identities, and you cannot destroy that. It is too rich too important,it would be a terrible impoverishment. This vision of the European Union is part of the globalist agenda to replace the nation-states with a world government that would be the United Nations, an international center that would promulgate laws for the entire planet. This is very clear from the speeches of Javier Solana, from his desire to strengthen the U.N. by weakening the European States. This is part of a humanist aspect of Communism: they want to recreate a fraternal humanity, without borders, without divisions, subject to the same laws, in which everyone is equal, everyone is kind and gentle, and in which the differences between the peoples would disappear. It's a little like what the Soviet Union wanted to do.

That is one aspect of Eurabia. The other aspect is the union with the Arab world, the creation of a Mediterranean civilization, which is a step towards the larger phase of globalization. This globalization will take place as the civilization continues to expand, leaving the domaine of nation-states, and taking in more and more different peoples, uniting with other continents and peoples. This is an intermediate step towards a supranational state that would mean the destruction of Europe in order to bring in the other nations.
We find this in the works of Carl Bildt, and other important politicians of the 70's, 80's and 90's. We see that Eurabia has several levels, and what I studied in my book Eurabia is another phenomenon: the destruction of Europe which is in parallel with an historical movement - the destruction of Judeo-Christian States by Islam. This aspect is different but complementary.
It was my specialty to study the historical texts to determine how Judeo-Christian nations, that had no Muslims, that didn't speak Arabic or Turkish, how did these nations, that represented the heights of civilization, such as Egypt with Alexandria as its capital, and Byzantium, become Islamized? What were the processes that led the people who were largely Christian to become Muslims and begin to speak Arabic or Turkish, and also Central Europe - don't forget the Turkish Empire went almost as far as Vienna - and Hungary and the Balkans? It was an enormous empire. What brought about the transformation of Christian nations?
There were two primordial levers that led to the transformation - jihad and sharia. Jihad is an ideology. There is no equivalent in Christian civilization. It doesn't exist. To understand jihad you have to read the Islamic texts to see the difference. Because European colonization was not a jihad, it was completely different. The Europeans left after one century.

Now we are back in an era of very active jihad and sharia, and now sharia, with the so-called Arab Spring, will be applied in all Muslim countries. We are in a period of jihad in all of its forms, some peaceful, such as immigration, such as certain Islamic precepts and concepts that are very important, for example, what we Westerners would call the destruction of history. For us history consists of events that can be proven, dated, and verified by archeological evidence, or some other kind. But in Islam, history is whatever confirms the Koran. It is religious history, not history in the sense of Greek, Western or Cartesian rationalism. And we are in the process of renouncing our history, our conception of history to adopt an Islamic conception of history. Obviously this has repercussions on our identity, on our culture, and so gradually, without realizing it, we are entering into a process of intellectual Islamization. Through the schools, the teaching, and this is promoted by our own State authorities. There is also another very important element in the transformation of Christian nations into Islamic nations, this is what I call dhimmitude, a system of laws regulating the status of populations conquered by Islam: Christians, Jews, and non-Muslims, and these laws established a permanent feeling of insecurity. That is to say, these populations were protected by Islamic law in a status of permanent insecurity, and humiliation and violence.
She describes how Islam uses constant attacks (as in Gaza) to strike permanent fear into the populations, who are forced to abandon their lands. Islam then moves in closer and closer to those lands that have not been Islamized, lands that must be conquered by war.
So there is this past of wars, conquests and slavery that is not spoken of. Islamic slavery is religious slavery, not necessarily racial. Non-Muslims were destined for slavery. Then there is the past history of very violent conquests, exterminations, genocide - such as the Armenian genocide, and I believe we are a bit responsible for the current situation, in particular our governments, because instead of denouncing these facts as we do with Western history - we speak of the genocide of the Jews, and all sorts of genocide that we have committed, we speak of the massacres during the war, and of slavery. Instead of doing this with the Muslims, on the contrary we have taken refuge in denial. Which means that we have not allowed this people to develop self-critical thinking and to arm themselves against a return of the past. In this respect, we are to blame as well.

Because as I write, the West is a victim of jihad. But the victim has a duty towards his oppressor, this duty is to bear witness. It is important for the victim to teach his oppressor about the evil he is doing. But if the victims repeat constantly, for example to the Palestinians, that they are wonderful, as the prelates, the heads of the churches do in the Middle East, even though the Palestinians represent the avant-guard of anti-Western, hence anti-Jewish jihad… You need a lot of courage, but I understand why they do not have courage, why they cannot speak. But perhaps in the West, the time for talking has passed. But there was a time for words, a time for bearing witness of the suffering of the victims, for humanizing the oppressor and for curing the oppressor. My books on dhimmitude are the testimony of the victim. It is very important for this testimony to be accepted and supported by the oppressor. There are Muslims who reject this past and seek a form of modernization, in order to set the good Muslim on the path of modernization and rejection of the past.So there is the problem of Eurabia, which is the problem of the destruction of our civilization. In my book I examine the mechanisms that led our nations to self-destruct and to betray their own people. How did this happen? What collusion took place? What forces were at play? There are of course many elements in this Titanic, this culture and civilization that are in the process of collapsing before our eyes.
This is Eurabia.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

OSCE Oct 3, 2012

There were 70 speakers, all cut to 1.5 minutes each. Basically, every group was whining about theirvictimhood! Some of which I have never heard, like Jehova's Witnesses in Turkestan!

 Interesting to me were the Muslim groups from the OIC area, as if they were a persecuted minority! Uniformly, these groups call for more legislation, more reporting of "hate crimes" against Muslims.
A few thoughts:
  • Most of the "hate crimes" agaiinst Muslims in the US have turned out to be staged by the Muslims themselves, such as slogans on Mosque walls, etc.
  • That the "hatred and discrimination" about which the Muslims complain are NOT owing to their religion, but to THEIR hostility to the surrounding host culture!
When the Muslims whine about "minority rights", their call for "Laws Against Islamomophobia" is a perfect example.
  • This small and perpetually "offended", minority group, maybe 2% of the population , demands that the majority 98% overturn and abandon their Constitution and surrender their cherished free speech rights!  (I don't think so!)
  • They would make Muslims "more equal than others" in the society by demanding special accomodations! They demand work place time off to pray, foot washing stations in public facilities,  food in public schools be changed to suit their halal requirements, etc.  Why? Basically to impose their Shari'a Law upon us! It's already happening in the Courts in regard to Family Law.
  • At the Conference the Muslims actually threatened us!  Our tiny group spoke out against the concept of "Islamophobia", and we were branded "dangerous"!  And that we "threatened dialogue"!  In other words, the only kind of dialogue the Muslims will tolerate is submission!
  • And speaking of "tolerance and dialogue", it has to be a two way street.  When the Musliims "demand" tolerance and respect and do not show it to others, (for instance towards Christians and Jews), it degenerates  into indimidation!
  • The spokesman for one of the groups actually said "if  Blasphemy Laws are not passed in the West, it will jeopardize world peace!" He further went on to say "you can't insult 1.7 billion people!"
Comment:  the Muslims insult 1.8 billion Christians on a daily basis by their attacks in Nigeria, Indonesia, Turkey, Egypt, Pakistan, and elsewhere. The Mullahs and Imams consistently lambaste Christian members of their communities from their pulpits, resulting in destructive mobs surging out of the Mosques after Friday prayers.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

US Delegation, 1 October 2012

When a member of the US Delegation opened his remarks, his first words were "I am President of MPAC."  This stands for "Muslim Political Action Committee".  Now the most important issue to be dealt with at this Conference was the Turkish Delegation's intention to present a Proposal to make "Islamophobia" a " Crime against humanity", a frontal assault on our Constitution and the First Amendment. Yet who do we have "guarding" our Constitution? A Member of the MPAC.

And why is a lobbyist representing the administration in a diplomatic status? Is this more Obama cronyism?

Instead of having our representatives serve as a bulwark to defend the Constitution, we had Muslims who agree with the OIC position, and kept talking about the necessity for hate speech legislation! But what is "hate speech"?

The Muslims continually talk about the "abuse of free speech" and the necessity to limit it. The metaphor used is "you can't yell fire in a crowded theatre!" But if someone is building a fire in the theatre, you are obligated to "yell fire in a crowded theatre"! If you do not, people will die!

Another limitation is "speech that incites violence!" But the Muslims have turned this on its head!  If someone is expressing their Constitutional right to free speech, telling the absolute truth, this is the bulwark to our liberties that leads to better government and open inquiry.

But if another decides they do not like what's being said, and/or are concerned that something untoward may be revealed about them, and they decide to threaten violence, THE THREAT ITSELF MUST NOT RENDER THE SPEECH ILLEGAL! But this is precisely what the Muslims are calling for! This means they can cancel anyone's free speech merely by threatening those who attempt to practice it!

Law Enforcement must interpret their role as defending citizens who are exercizing their rights, not being enforcers of the oppressors in order to "keep the peace". Too often, the Police shut down an event because the Muslims have made threats! This must stop!

Monday, October 1, 2012

Enemy Document

This definition of "Islamophobia" goes down the list of the Muslim Brotherhood's "Civilizational Jihad" strategy as per the Strategic Memorandum.


Full enjoyment of religious rights is in the Constitution.Root causes of violence is lack of "education". We need religious dialogue and education. New Mufti in Croatia.

Kazakstan: "Kingdom of God": priests and missionaries must register. Harsh punishment if you don't register. Government demanded lists of individuals involved in the process. Proselitizing is being criminalized.  State is supposed to be secualar and doesn't mention any licensing. No right to refuse licensing. Conscientious objections have

Demonization of Islam.  Quoting Islamic Scripture is "lies" and "spreading hate". Islamophobia hatred. 1.7 billion people cannot be insulted! Demonization and Insult.

It is the definition of "slander": Islamophobia a "threat" to our society?

OSCE Meeting Afternoon Session

Venice Commission from democracy and law:

Assessments on freedom of expression and religion opinions. Plenary session to be held next week. Laws to be examined such as registration of religious organizations, education, prosletism,religious symbols.

Relationship of freedom and religious freedom and blasphemy laws. Incitement to hatred should be criminalized. Not offense to a religion. 

BPE: human rights belong to people. Threats against freedom of expression ; film and apostasy. Islamic Law is clear on killing apostates. Respect and mutual tolerance precludes this, and everyone needs a right to do so. Others have lost family, friends, and have had to live in hiding.

Pax Europa suports the protection of apostates.

Fundamental rights of religion in Romania and protection of minority groups. Government considers it a mere criminal case. Cama yurga, human trafficing. No transparancy in ex-Communist area.

Mocking of Christian groups and faith, ridiculing Chirstian religion: needs a fine line to restrict freedom of speech. But it needs to be consistent.

Media needs to not target Christians and then treat Islam with kid gloves, and not to spread stereotypes and ridicule about Christians.

National security is not a reason for restricting religious freedom. Unequal responsibility to qualify as certain religious groups. Limitations on legal status and worship, small groups cannot qualify.

Religious minorities policy. Russia interested, Kazakstan, French secularism has been adopted in countries where there is no separation of church and state. Need
  • policy on children,
Westen countries threatened by the Muslim

LGBT: sexual minorities are discriminated against by religious groups. 

Muslim denomination in Bulgaria

Mosques, cultural educational centers, "Muslim Confession" need for Islamic Institutes.

CAIR Canada speaks at the OSCE Conference

Asurbijahn Jehova's Witnesses didn't get registered because of chicken shit technical manoeuvering. They have been persecuted by the Governments and can't even meet in their homes, can't import Bibles or other material, or censorship .

Canadian CAIR: promote Civic engagement to strengthen Canadian society. Tolerant. Intolerance and fear.  Human and civil rights: cross or beards, is discriminatory. Religion, process Mulitculturalism and Ontario's committee on human rights.

MPAC President Speaks

He stated that the Prophet  allowed pluralism in Arabia by inviting Jews into it. Mentioned UN Resolution 16/18 as an "effective way to deal with religious discrimination" which trashes our 1st Amendment.


Breakout Session during lunch Oct 1st

The Muslim Alliance Breakout Session:

Religious expression has its limits. There has been an "abuse of  freedom of expression in Insulting the Prophet. There is:
  • Hatred of Islam
  • Segregation of Muslim communities
  • Increasd unemployment
  • Terrorism is caused by the Islamophobia that pushes the young into the Jihad groups
  • The Majority of the insults come from Anglo-Saxon countries
Equal rights means equal responsibilities. Society has an obligation :
  • To prohibit the Media from promoting secualrism
  • Help the Muslims maintain their ethnic identity
  • To "build bridges with Muslim Communities
  • To promote Tolerance
We need a Charter of morality that would encompass all Faiths!

Comments: If they are concerned for hatred of Muslims, maybe if they'd stop wageing Jihad on Non-believers, the non-believers would be more accepting of them.
The Imams are the ones who segregate the young in Muslim communities by forbidding them to associate with non-believers, lest they lose their Muslim ways. To say Terrorism is caused by our marginalizing Muslims is patently absurd. Remember, the Jihad attack in Glasgow the summer of 2007 was perpetrated by NHS physician Muslims, not uneducated, not marginalized, not unemployed!

For the Muslim leadership to expect Western societies to accomodate them, to "tolerate their intolerance" is patently absurd. If they wish to participate in Western Society, they will have to adapt to OUR ways, not vice versa.

OSCE Meeting 1 Oct 2012

In Islam, no right to change what we believe. Can't worship without Freedom of Speech we are led to like sheep to the slaughter.  Freedom from Fear.

Secular societies are oppressing expression, such as religious schools and mass media against religious expression. Like changing their religion, (apostasy laws).  Threatens peace and security.

Kazakstan Bureau of Human Rights

Situation to laws on religious laws in Kazakstan. International Standards do not require religious groups to register. There are no fining of non-registered groups. No unjustified interference of security services.

Tajikistan Bureau of Human rights

Tajikstan considers human rights a priority, in 2010 the President affirmed religious rights, and is a secular state. Freedom of conscious and religious associations. No preference to any religious sect. Freedom religious and secular conscience. We do register all these associations, foreign and domestic. Religious education is provided for after education in state schools.

We do not allow is that individuals abuse their relgious rights by imposing on the rights of others. Everyone has their rights in terms of religion and creed.

Muslim Domination of Bulgaria

Sept 2012. Proceeding against clerics sermonizing radicalism. Allegations are untrue and endanger public order and security. No radical Islam in Bulgaria. No protests about the film in Bulgaria. We call on the OSCE to monitor the proceeding

Democratization on Kazakstan

Radical changes in society: more believers. 4400 religious organizations. Large number of missionaries, many requests for registration.  Models for secularism and democracy. Our goal was to defend our religious rights: neutrality, parity, tolerance, equality. Democratic secular state

Tolerance of ethnic minorities for 3000 years. Law today freedom of conscience guaranteed. It monitors conditions and compliance. 2000 religious associations, 90% are Muslim. We have 20 years 85,000 went on Hajj, others went to holy places. We printed Qur'an in brail. Tashkent is center of Islamic culture.

Interior International

New religous movements in Europe. Mutual distrust and many have given up on being recognized. owing to unfavorable press. Totalitarian paradigm in Europe regarding religion by secularism. Must be implemented at loal level. Transparency tolerance.

preoccupied by LGBT issues: what a joke!

Registration is essential for all associations .  Baptist and Lutheran associations have been reduced and their associations have been dwindled.

We would like to respond to complaints to religious freedoms.  WE implement freedom. 2225 accociations exist. 159 christian 8 Jewish 8 Ba'hi, Bhuddist shrine . All freedom of religion is in place. you can't proseletize and you must register.

Hate crime legislation

Religious intolerance doesn't exist in Georgia. Mosque, Synagogue and church all exist together. July 6, 2011 a law gives all religious groups.

UK promotes religious rights, and includes applications to all groups.

Guide lines of policy of abuse by sects. We will respond later this afternoon.

Mr Billfob
Religion is a basic human right. Theistic, non-theistic, and atheistic groups.  Minorities within minorities respected. Universalism is thought,
freedom to worship or not to worship, to conversion, and the right to non-coersive conversion. Restrictions i Article 18 Paragraph III.  Burden of Proof on those who wish to restrict.
Positive interrelation of human rights. Belief, assembly, expression all go together. Freedom of speech.
Hate speech counters by more speech, not restrictions.

OSCE Meeting Warsaw Oct 1,2012!/delta.mike.161

OSCE Oct 1st, 2012

  • Denial of LGTB signage categories in UK
  • Freedom of belief EU Guidelines
  • My address on "Islamophobia":

Thank you Mme Chairman of the OSCE

Islamophobia, sounds like homophobia
Phony word devised by British Muslims in the 1980's
Trying to imply that concern over Islam is irrational bigotry
However: no separation between religion and politics in Islam
Ideology calls for conversion/death/enslavement of all mankind
oppresses women
killed 270 millions in Jihad over the centuries and is killing people on a daily basis
Therefore: Islamophobia as an irrational bigotry does not exist.
But there IS a legitimate concern for an aggressive Islam that
Wages war on unbelievers until they submit to the Shari'a, pay the jizya, and feel themselves subdued. as called for in Sura 9:5, the so-called "ayat saif"

Therefore, any attempt to make "Islamophobia' illegal, basically is trying to criminalize peoples instinct for self preservation and inappropriate.

//as I left the podium, I got long looks from the Islamic contingent.

UK talking about tolerance and freedom of expression. But they oppress the EDL persecute it's members and forbid their freedom of assembly.

  • Persecution of the Church of Scientology in Ubekistan as well as other minority religions.
  • Persecution of Muslims in the West, and we were threatened by Islam to adopt the Blasphemy Laws.

OSCE Meeting Oct 1, 2012

Mr Frank Cogan, chairman of the OSCE spoke of the necessity of accepting the UDHR by the UN of 1948. No mention of the OIC notifying the UN that the Cairo Declaration of HR in Islam subordinates all Human Rights is subject to the Shari'a.

No mention that the Shari'a does not give the same status to non-believers as believers: they treat women differently under the Shari'a. No mention of persecution of the Copts in Egypt, the Christians in Nigeria, Pakistan, Iraq, Lebanon.

Specific status of religious communities: recognition need not mean legal subsidy and priviledge, but only non-discrimination. Respect, procedures non-discrimination.

There are fifty speakers, all at 2 minutes apiece.
  • Jehova's witnesses in France
  • Usbekestan peaceful religious beliefs persecuted for "Illegal religious activities"of Jehova's Witnesses.
  • Persecution of Turkish minorities in Greece
  • LBGT categories discriminatory.
  • Freedom of religion and freedom of speech but have to address. The Mosque in Murfeesboro mentioned.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

some of trhe Dhimmi European press are blaming the "Innocence of Muslims" to a sinister Jewish plot.
Sunday evening meeting prior to the OCSE Conference. Elizabeth SW arrived !@ 10: PM.  We are getting speaknig slots and filing papers. The Turkish Delegation has in mind a proposal to declare "Islampohobia a crime against humanity", which is BS, even though the enforcement of the Shari'a Blasphemy laws are  the whole purpose of the world wide riots over the last couple of weeks.

Sunday Night Sept 30

Meeting of Counter Jihad forces in Warsaw, lobby of hotel in Warscheau.

ESW has been delayed, owing to thre fact that her flight was diverted through Dusseldorf au lieu de direct WAW.
Klaus has just arrived with biere et Juice d'orange. We
 have Felix (DE) Lisa and Klaus, David from BRU et David from Colorado et Alain de Paris.

We are awaiting ESW's arrival to commence the stategy meeting.  Now we have learned the airline has lost her luggage, incurring MORE delay!  Most of the Proposals at this Conference are EVIL. Especially the  Turkish delegation's proposal to make "Islamophobia" a "crime against humanity!"

Erogan is pushing for some sort of declaration of this sort. This is the purpose of the violence  all over the world: to enfoce the Shari'a  Blasphemy Laws in the West. The threat for non-compliance was not even veiled: " the violenc may happen again!" (Note: 7.62 gatling guns can turn mobs into dead meat!

J'arrive au WAW il y a tres heures. Je prens une sieste apres demain.  Donc, reconre pour diner aux six heures.

Discussing Shari'a Compliant finance (SCF): 2.5% goes to Zakat, 1/8 of which goes to Jihad. Therefore, any Western Nation that allows SCF is basically helping to finance its own destruction.,

If the State has a duty to protect citizens, then they need to stop the "Grooming" process of Muslim men basically enslaving teen-age western girls as sex-slaves. The police in UK has been ignoring this issue for years,, saying to enfoce the law and protect the girls, would "damage community relations" with the Muslims.

If the President is returned to Office, you can plan on there being a masive "Environomentaal Review" on all the 'fracking in North and South America, shutting it down,. The purpose is to make us more dependent on the Middle East, sending them $500 Bn + to the Middle East to fund Jihad..

In the last French election, a Muslim Imam declared that a vote for Hollende was "halel". Eventually the Euro will collapse. The German tax payers will not finance  Geek spend thrifts indefinitely.

If the President is re=elected,

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Blasphemy Laws

To the Editor:

The Muslims assert that free speech should not "incite violence": that it is equivalent to "yelling fire in a crowded theater!" But to follow the metaphor, if the Muslims are building a fire in the theater, we are OBLIGATED TO YELL “FIRE” IN A CROWDED THEATER!

This premise is flawed, because it means anyone who threatens violence can deprive anyone else of their free speech rights merely by the threat!"

Unfortunately, Law Enforcement has this backwards. The way it's working now, if we try to put on an event bringing in a speaker who tells the truth about Islam, the Muslims threaten violence and the Police shut down the event. They interpret their role as "keeping the peace"!

But it should be the threatening of violence that's illegal, not the exercising of our Constitutional right to Free Speech! Most public officials take an oath to "defend and protect the Constitution". Therefore, they need to prioritize defending the Constitutional rights of citizens and DEFEND THEM AGAINST THOSE THAT THREATEN VIOLENCE, not be the oppressive enforcers!

The President has broken his Oath of Office to “defend and protect the Constitution”  by siding with the Muslims in calling for enforcement of Shari'a Blasphemy laws in the United States. These laws are in direct contravention of our cherished the First Amendment.

People should understand that Shari’a Blasphemy laws have nothing to do with saying unkind things about Islam, but everything to do with prohibiting non-believers from studying, discussing much less criticizing Islam: to wit, taking Islam completely "off the table" in our free market place of ideas! This is a very dangerous thing to do!

Dave Petteys

Roxborough Park, CO 80125

720 922 9092

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Pat Condell on “Word to Rioting Muslims”

Islam is the “crime against humanity”, not “Islamophobia”

Dishonorable Disclosures

Dishonorable Disclosures

Muslim “Rage”: time to stop blaming the victims.

The nonsense that everyone must tip toe around Muslims to prevent the violence is useless. The Muslims will continue until we completely submit to the Shari’a!  What will society say when the demand is to send annually 10,000 virgin 14 year olds to Turkey as tribute?

Friday, September 14, 2012

Half Mast Nation

With the Administration’s feckless policies, more and more American officials and citizens are being killed. Thus, the hallmark of his “Fundamental Change” (of diminishing and humiliating America because in the President’s anti-American and anti-colonialist view  we’ve been “such a bully!”) has been the flag at half mast!  With no indication this policy will change, we might as well leave the flag at half mast for the rest of the President’s term.

Obama pleased to meet you blue alex jones copy

AQ Economic Warfare by Setting Fires

Saturday, September 1, 2012


First: To mandate "full employment" to the Fed is as nonsensical as "Muslim Outreach" to NASA, ( unless we can figure out a way to power rockets with suicide vests).

Next: There is no way that Bernanke and his printing presses will be able to undo the damage to the economy inflicted by the punishing taxes and regulations administered by the hostile progressive Obama administration.

Lastly: Bernanke is like the boy with the hammer that treats every problem as a nail, except Bernanke has a printing press.

Why if Obama is elected, you can kiss your IRA and 401K goodbye.

If the President is re-elected, he will consider it a mandate to turn America into an Argentina, a previously wealthy country bankrupted by a populist ruler who redistributed the wealth to the rabble that would keep him in power, thus impoverishing the country.  Sound familiar?

As the credit rating of the country deteriorates, in order to continue to sell bonds to  finance the deficit spending, he will raid the trillions in IRA’s and 401K’s, replacing the funds with worthless, illiquid Government bonds. He will justify the action by saying things like “safeguarding people’s retirements” or “insulating people’s life savings from the uncertainties of the markets”, etc.  It’s a lie, of course, but when did that ever stop politicians of either party?

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Muslim Jihadists Starting Forest Fires in the West?

Of course, we at the Politically Correct Institute consider this no more than another slanderous insult to Islam and an example of hate and bigotry against Muslims! Here’s what we must do to atone:

1. Appoint a Muslim to head the Forest Service

2. Hire more Muslim firefighters

3. Forbid news coverage of forest fires from now on

Only in this way, can we reach out to Muslims and make them feel less insulted and a bigger part of the American community and to safeguard Muslims against the possibility of a backlash from right wing haters who have lost homes, livestock and property in these alleged conflegrations.

Medieval Jewish Blood Libel Alive and Well in Saudi Arabia

Our erstwhile “ally” !

Al Qaeda starting the fires in the West

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Welfare and “Community Organizers”of the Democratic Party

From a friend of mine in Pueblo, CO

Last week I was in the Rocky Mountain Eye Care Center in Pueblo for follow-up on my surgery.  Sitting next to me were two welfare queens I estimate in their mid 40's bragging about never paying for any medical services, even comparing how they scam the system.  In the conversation they discussed how phone calls from jails and prisons are always collect to the outside and the charge is $5.00 which I know is somewhat factual.
It now gets interesting.  One of them said her boyfriend who is in the county jail calls her every day and she takes the calls but does not pay the fee and gets away with it with the phone company because she is destitute as far as they are concerned.  She said the money is used on weed and partying at clubs and none of it would ever go to a Republican. 
She advised her welfare queen friend that she would again vote for Obama if for no other reason than she knew George Bush owns all the phones in jails and prisons and every call that is made makes him richer.  She also said that if Romney is elected he will be given the phones by Bush because that is the way Republicans do things. 
She said she was promised by a Democrat who visited her apartment complex funded by Section 8 money and spoke to residents that by re-electing Obama that would stop and the money would go to Democrats so they can be elected and take the property from rich people with jobs and give it to poor people who deserve better.
This is how the Democrat operatives from organizations like ACORN (think community organizers) do it.  I wonder if a Republican community organizer would be given equal access?


Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Deadly Night in Houla, (city on Syria)

This has to do with the persecution of Christians in Syria. There are 1.5 million Christians in Syria that will be butchered or driven from their homes by the Salafist rebels that Senator McCain wants to support.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Olympics Hope and Change

The Politically Correct Caucus announced today their demands for the 2016 Olympic Games.  “It is hurtful and unfair that some do not make the Olympic Teams but others do.  It is equally unfair and hurtful that Gold Medals are awarded to only one person in each event.”  The spokesperson went on to say: “such a system encourages excess effort and striving to do better than your neighbors, which is selfish and makes your friends look bad. These are not the community values we should be encouraging!”

the Politically Correct Caucus went on to put forth their demands:

  • That Olympic Teams be selected by National lottery, with no qualifications or restrictions. “This gives all people an equal chance and is the only fair way to do it” said the spokesperson.
  • That any training for the events be prohibited. “It would show individualism and lack of cooperation that is unhealthy” the spokesperson went on to say.
  • That events be demonstrations of cooperation and not unhealthy competition. “We envision  participants  holding hands and crossing the finish line together, singing ‘Kum Bah Yah’ rather than trying to best one another.  And of course everyone would get a gold medal! Is this not a better way?  It would be a change for the better, and each citizen would have hope of getting on an Olympic Team!”

Muslim Bigotry

Ahmed Bedier & ZJ Hafeez Promote Hate & Bigotry

Friday, August 3, 2012


The Fraud and Deception of “ChrIslam”

. John 10:10 says: “The thief comes to steal, kill and destroy”. Is this not an adequate description of a Bedouin raider society that preys on others? This enemy is an insidious, deceptive evil that is using our sense of common decency to destroy us. Islam attacks our society in ways such that they can accuse us of “forsaking our principals” if we seek to defend ourselves! (Satan is always the “accuser of the brethren”). The Muslims use the principle of “free speech” to destroy ours. They say “tolerance” means we have to tolerate their intolerance. Their “freedom of religion” means they have the right to deprive us of ours! So far, the self-loathing multiculturalists in our society agree with them!



This is a photograph taken in Feb 2012 in the Saddleback Church in Orange County, California, home to über-Pastor Rick Warren (Obama inauguration, Purpose Driven Life, etc.) who has joined forces with Southern California mosques to adopt a three-step plan for ‘ending enmity between evangelical Christians and Muslims[1]. It’s only fair to point out that 80% of the Mosques in the United States are controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood, whose motto is:

· “Allah is our objective,

· The Prophet is our leader,

· the Qur’an is our Law,

· Jihad is our Way,

· Dying in the Way of Allah our highest hope.”[2]

One question: is it the Holy Spirit or Muslim money the motivation? Theologically, the Muslims use the Zakat (Muslim Charity) for “THOSE WHOSE HEARTS ARE TO BE RECONCILED”[3]. (Translation: co-opting and buying off Western politicians and other leaders, such as Pastors!)

Obviously, Pastor Warren’s call to “consult texts we each call sacred in order to form a basis that allows us the privilege to serve the needs in our communities together”, as it says on the slide, is impossible if done honestly. All one has to do is exactly what they say: to consult the texts and verify the total incompatibility!


It is a counterfactual that Islam and Christianity are compatible To show this, we will l walk through the techniques and points that Muslims use to attack and “evangelize” Christians (“Da’wah). Then we will examine Christian doctrine and compare it with the Qur’an and Hadith.


Three concepts are used to approach Christians and Jews: Tawheed, Akhira and Prophethood/Guidance [4]

Tawheed: the oneness of God. The Muslims start by saying we all worships the same one God as a way to get their foot in the door. But eventually they will say it is “Shirk” (a grievous sin) to believe the dogma of the human-God Jesus as the son of God, or in the Trinity. Therefore, the Christian world cannot resolve its problems with Islam without complete submission to Allah and His Guidance.

Comment: where is the compatibility of Christianity and Islam here? Islamic doctrine has no provision for peaceful coexistence on the basis of equality with other religions. Bear in mind: “submission to Allah” in practical terms means submission to the Shari’ah and the arbitrary rule of the Sura Councils in the various Mosques! The consistent rule of law would disappear!

If you look at any Islamic country, what you see is an economic and civil rights basket case! Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan under the Taliban are perfect examples of what’s in store for mankind under “Allah’s Guidance”!

Akhira: the accountability to God. If we believe in the burning hell of Islam, then we will govern lives by fear of going there. We will have an incentive to “clean up our act”. Islamic apologists assure everyone this will eliminate the urge for sexual misconduct, selfishness, living within one’s means and will right all the wrongs of human society.

Comment: interestingly enough, the promise of 72 virgins in Paradise to encourage sex-starved teen age boys to martyr themselves in “Shaheed” operations seems to be the flip side! As the Marxists did during the cold war, the Muslims draw a comparison between a real Western society and their own theological utopian vision. Unsurprisingly, reality in the West falls woefully short. But to call for a comparison of the West to the miserable realities of existing Islamic societies is met with accusatory howls of “Bigotry”,” hate”, and “Islamophobia!”

Prophet hood/Guidance: All Prophets leave us with a code of conduct, such as Moses and his Ten Commandments or Jesus and his Sermon on the Mount. But the Muslims hold that the later prophets supersede previous ones! Thus, since Muhammad is “The Final Prophet”, he has superseded both Moses and Jesus! Mankind MUST follow the latest guidance brought by the last Messenger! (This is the ultimate aim of the “Abrahamic Initiative”). To quote Shamim Siddiqi: [5]

“It should be emphasized to the people of the land that man has lost the Guidance that was delivered in the form of the Torah and the Bible through human innovations and negligence. Hence, they have no choice but to accept the Qur’an as the only Guidance now available to mankind to follow.”

Comment: this is not what we believe as Christians. Jesus said:

Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the law until all is accomplished.”[6]

Bible scholars have long been aware of the linkage and interdependence of the Jewish Testament and the New Testament. Superscessionism has been thoroughly rejected.

Note that the Bible is filled with metaphors of sewing and reaping, and other agricultural images. The Qur’an, on the other hand, discusses the hatred of non-believers and how to treat slaves and captured booty. This should serve as a strong indicator of the incompatibility of Judeo-Christian traditions and Islam!



“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God”.[7]

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 17:

Sahih International: They have certainly disbelieved who say that Allah is Christ, the son of Mary. Say, "Then who could prevent Allah at all if He had intended to destroy Christ, the son of Mary, or his mother or everyone on the earth?" And to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and whatever is between them. He creates what He wills, and Allah is over all things competent.

Comment: the divinity of Jesus, the “Word made flesh” is incompatible with the distant and dominating Allah who “creates what He wills.”


The Crislam apologists say “Jesus is mentioned in the Qur’an”, as if this were sufficient to reconcile the two faiths. Let us take a closer look;

I believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible.

Do we worship the same God?
This is a key tenant of “ChrIslam: that “we worship the same God. If there are 1.2 billion Muslims out of a world population of 6 billion, then Muslims constitute roughly 20% of humanity. The Qur’an teaches that humanity is divided into believers and “the Kuffar” (hated non-believers). According to the Qur’an[9] and the Sunna, a “Kafir”[10] can be

· Mocked. Q83:34. On that day the faithful will mock the Kafirs, while they sit on bridal couches and watch them. Should not the kafirs be paid back for what they did?

· Punished: Q25:77. Say to the kafirs: My Lord does not care for you or your prayers. You have rejected the truth, so sooner or later, a punishment will come.

· Confused by Allah. Q6:25: Some among them listen to you [Muhammad], but We have cast veils over their [kafirs] hearts and heaviness to their ears so that they cannot understand our signs [the Koran].

· Plotted against. Q86:15. They plot and scheme against you [Muhammad], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the kafirs and leave them alone for awhile.

· Terrorized. Q8:12. Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!

· Deceived. Sahih Bukhari B5,59,369; Mohammed asked, “Who will kill Ka’b, the enemy of Allah and Mohammed?” Bin Maslama rose and responded, “O Mohammed! Would it please you if I killed him?” Mohammed answered, “Yes.” Bin Maslama then said, “Give me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plot will succeed.” Mohammed replied “You may speak falsely to him.”

· Annihilated: Q6:45. So the kafirs were annihilated. All praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds!

· Stolen from: Sahih Bukhari 5,59,537. On the day of Khaybar, Allah’s Apostle divided the spoils of war of Khaybar with the ratio of two shares for the horse and one share for the foot soldier.

· Killed: Q4:91. If they do not keep away from you or offer your peace or withdraw their hostilities, then seize them and kill them wherever they are. We give you complete authority over them.

· Crucified: Q5:33. The only reward for those who war against Allah and His messengers and strive to commit mischief on the earth is that they will be slain or crucified, have their alternate hands and feet cut off, or be banished from the land. This will be their disgrace in this world, and a great torment shall be theirs in the next except those who repent before you overpower them. Know that Allah is forgiving and merciful.

· Made war on, Q9:29.Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya], and they are humiliated.

· A Muslim is not a friend of the Kafir: Q3:28. Believers should not take kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah’s protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him.

· A kafir is ignorant: Q6:111: Even if We had sent down the angels to them [kafirs], the dead had spoken to them, and We had gathered all things before their eyes, they would not believe unless Allah had willed it, but most of them are ignorant.

· A kafir is blind: Q27:80: You can not make the dead listen or the deaf to hear, when they have turned to flee, nor can you guide the blind from their errors.

· A kafir is arrogant: Q40:76: Enter the gates of Hell to live there forever. Evil is the abode of the arrogant ones.

· A kafir is evil: Q23:97: And say: Oh my Lord! I seek refuge with you from the suggestions of the evil ones [kafirs]. And I seek refuge with you, my Lord, from their presence.

· A kafir is a liar: Q51:10: Cursed are the liars, who stumble along in the depths of ignorance!

· A kafir is disgraced: Q37:18: Tell them, “Yes! And you [kafirs] will be disgraced.”

· A kafir is a partner of Satan: Q25:55: And still they worship others besides Allah who can neither help nor hurt them. The kafir is Satan’s ally against Allah.

· A kafir is unclean: Q9:28: Oh, believers, only the kafirs are unclean.

· A kafir is cursed: Q33:60: They [kafirs] will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and murdered. It was Allah’s same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah’s ways.

Can we seriously believe that Allah, who apparently detests 80% of all humanity, is the same loving God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob who loves and cares for all his children? Remember this when “the guest Imam” asserts “The Qur’an speaks to all humanity”.

I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all ages, God from God, Light from Light, true God from True God, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father;

Chapter (18) sūrat l-kahf (The Cave) Verse 4

Yusuf Ali: Further, that He may warn those (also) who say, "Allah hath begotten a son”: (Note 2329)

Note 2329 The warning is not only needed for those who deny God or deny His Message, but also for those whose false ideas of God degrade religion in supposing that God begot a son, for God is One and is high above any ideas of physical reproduction.

Chapter (9) sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance) Verse 30[11]

Yusuf Ali: The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!

Comment: Either Jesus is the son of God, or he is not. These views are irreconcilable.

Through him all things were made. For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven, and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary, and became man.

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 17

Yusuf Ali: In blasphemy indeed are those that say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary. Say: "Who then hath the least power against Allah, if His will were to destroy Christ the son of Mary, his mother, and all every - one that is on the earth? For to Allah belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between. He createth what He pleaseth. For Allah hath power over all things."

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 72

Sahih International: They have certainly disbelieved who say, "Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary" while the Messiah has said, "O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Indeed, he who associates others with Allah – Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers.

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 75.
Abdullah Yusuf Ali: Christ, the son of Mary, was no more than an apostle; many were the apostles that passed away before him. His mother was a woman of truth. (Note 783) They had both to eat their (daily) food. See how God doth make his Signs clear to them; (Note 784) yet see in what ways they are deluded away from the truth!
Note 783 She never claimed that she was the mother of God, or that her son was God. She was a pious virtuous woman.
Note 784 Note how logically the argument has led up from Jewish back-slidings and want of faith , to blasphemies associated with the names of Jesus and Mary, and in the following verses to worship of senseless stocks and stones. God is one; His Message is one: yet how people’s perversity transforms truth into falsehood, religion into superstition!
Comment: either you believe God became incarnate through the Virgin Mary or you do not. Either you believe in the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus, or you do not. These views are irreconcilable.

For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered death and was buried, and rose again on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures.

Chapter (4) sūrat l-nisāa (The Women) Verse 157

Sahih International: And [for] their saying, "Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah." And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.

Comment: Christians believe in the crucifixion, death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. Muslims do not. These two views are incompatible and irreconcilable!

He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead and his kingdom will have no end.

From Da’wah Kitab al-Masahif Book 37, No 4310: (Referring to what Jesus will do when he comes again) “He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross kill swine and abolish Jizyah[12]. Allah will punish all religions except Islam. He will destroy the anti-Christ and will live on earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray over him.”

Comment: the eschatological view of Jesus’ return in Islam compared to the Christian view could not be more irreconcilable. For one thing, how could “his kingdom … have no end” if he is to die in forty years?

I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified, who has spoken through the prophets.

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 73

Sahih International: They have certainly disbelieved who say, "Allah is the third of three." And there is no god except one God. And if they do not desist from what they are saying, there will surely afflict the disbelievers among them a painful punishment.

Comment: Islam does not believe in the Trinity as do Christians. This is a major irreconcilable difference!

I believe in one, holy catholic and apostolic Church. I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen.

Chapter (1) sūrat l-fātiḥah (The Opening) Verses 6-7

Mohsin Khan: Guide us to the Straight Way: The Way of those on whom you have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).

Comment: This is a clear statement of Islamic Supremacy. The only way to “reconcile” with Islam is to submit. Islamic doctrine forbids and discounts any notion of dialogue on the basis of mutual respect and equality. Clearly, Islam and the Profession of Faith are neither compatible nor reconcilable.


“I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but by me.” [13]

Ecumenists blanch at the assertion “no one comes to the Father but by me”! It is so “non-inclusive and arrogant!” The assertion is politically incorrect to the self-loathing multiculturalists who strive for “Social Justice” and neglect the Gospel!

Sadly, too many churches have strayed from the Gospel of Jesus Christ. They preach a Marxist “social justice”, which seeks destruction of “the rich” and the redistribution of wealth as “salvation”. They appear to have accepted Science and rational thought as the final arbiter of truth. And since the “historical Jesus” can’t be verified “scientifically”, the Gospel must be “reinterpreted”. They see the crucifixion as “oppression of the working class”, “resurrection” as the coming of the “revolution”. The altar is adorned with an image of a bloody Christ toting an AK- 47 and bandoleers of ammunition!

In the hope of shoring up attendance, these churches have tried to make accommodation with the secular society by warping Biblical teachings to fit political correctness. “Tolerance and inclusivity” seem to be the cardinal virtues. Moral relativism and cultural equivalence has been the result. Thus, there is no longer any truth, nor are Judeo-Christian values any better than any others, nor is American society exceptional. Certainly, American society is nothing worth fighting for. All reality and truth become subjective: thus, “it may be evil for you, but not for me.” This has rendered many of today’s churches defenseless against this assault of Islam.


Returning to Da’wah: one approach to churches and synagogues is the so-called “Abrahamic Initiative”. It starts out by asserting that the three monotheistic religions sprung from Abraham, and all worship the same God (and we’ve dealt with that!). This Islamic concept implies that Islam has abrogated both Judaism and Christianity since Muhammad is indeed the “final Prophet”! It also asserts that the prophecies foretelling Muhammad’s coming were somehow suppressed, changed, or hidden in Jewish and Christian Scripture. Thus, all Jewish and Christian Scripture have been “corrupted”!

“Ibn Abbas said, ‘O Muslims? How do you ask the people of the Scriptures, though your Book (i.e. the Quran) which was revealed to His Prophet is the most recent information from Allah and you recite it, the Book that has not been distorted? Allah has revealed to you that the people of the scriptures have changed with their own hands what was revealed to them and they have said (as regards their changed Scriptures): This is from Allah, in order to get some worldly benefit thereby.’ Ibn Abbas added: ‘Isn't the knowledge revealed to you sufficient to prevent you from asking them? By Allah I have never seen any one of them asking (Muslims) about what has been revealed to you.’ “ [14]

The Muslims will say “Oh, we honor Jesus as you do,” but not as the Son of God, only a Muslim Prophet. As Siddiqi said: “Our call, which is against Shirk and against making the Prophet Jesus (God forbid!) as the son of God and believing in the Trinity, will be to God who is One, the Creator, the Lawgiver and the sustainer. God is the Supreme. The greatest crime in the sight of God is to ascribe partners to Him.”[15]

“IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”[16]

NOT to believe in Christ Jesus as the only Word of God made incarnate undermines the whole Christian faith! Here’s what the Church Fathers have to say in “Dominus Iesus” [17]:

9. In contemporary theological reflection there often emerges an approach to Jesus of Nazareth that considers him a particular, finite, historical figure, who reveals the divine not in an exclusive way, but in a way complementary with other revelatory and salvific figures. The Infinite, the Absolute, the Ultimate mystery of God would thus manifest itself to humanity in many ways and in many historical figures: Jesus of Nazareth would be one of these. More concretely, for some, Jesus would be one of the many faces which the Logos has assumed in the course of time to communicate with humanity in a salvific way.

Furthermore, to justify the universality of Christian salvation as well as the fact of religious pluralism, it has been proposed that there is an economy of the eternal Word that is valid also outside the Church and is unrelated to her, in addition to an economy of the incarnate Word. The first would have a greater universal value than the second, which is limited to Christians, though God’s presence would be more full in the second.

10. These theses are in profound conflict with the Christian faith. The doctrine of faith must be firmly believed which proclaims that Jesus of Nazareth, son of Mary, and he alone is the Son and the Word of the Father. The Word, which “was in the beginning with God” (Jn1:2) is the same as he who “became flesh” (Jn1:14). In Jesus, “the Christ the Son of the living God” (Mt 16:16), “the whole fullness of divinity dwells in bodily form” (Col2:9). He is the “only begotten Son of the Father, who is in the bosom of the Father” (Jn1:18), his “beloved Son, in whom we have redemption…In him the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him, God was pleased to reconcile all things to himself, on earth and in the heavens, making peace by the blood of his Cross” (Col1:13-14: 19-20)..”

“To introduce any sort of separation between the Word and Jesus Christ is contrary to the Christian faith….Jesus is the incarnate Word—a single and indivisible person…Christ is none other than Jesus of Nazareth; his is the Word of God made man for the salvation of all…In the process of discovering and appreciating the manifold gifts—especially the spiritual treasures—that God has bestowed on every people, we cannot separate those gifts from Jesus Christ, who is at the centre of God’s plan of salvation.”[18]

“And the word became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth; we have beheld his glory, glory as of the only son of the Father.”[19]

But from the Sira:[20]

“He knows what they intend and scheme and what comparison they seek to establish in their doctrine of Jesus when they make him God and Lord, when they possess the knowledge that he is nothing of the kind, thus behaving with insolence and infidelity. ‘He it is who forms you in the womb as He pleases,’ i.e. Jesus was one who was formed in the womb—they do not attempt to deny that—like every other child of Adam, so how can he be God when he had occupied such a place?”

The Divinity of Jesus Christ is a key to the Christian faith, a belief not shared by Islam. This renders Islam and Christianity hopelessly irreconcilable.


9 but as it is written, Things which eye saw not, and ear heard not, And which entered not into the heart of man, Whatsoever things God prepared for them that love him.[21]

But in the Qur’an:

Chapter (78) sūrat l-naba (The Great News) Verses 31-33

Sahih International: Indeed, for the righteous is attainment -Gardens and grapevines: And full-breasted [companions] of equal age.

Christian mystics may have reported their glimpses of heaven. But Sunni Islam assures a sexual smorgasbord of 72 virgins for its sex-starved teen-aged suicide bombers. A Muslim once told me: “We have no reason to stay on earth, but 72 reasons to go to heaven!”


Do to others as you would have them do to you.[22]

The Qur’anic response:

Chapter (4) sūrat l-nisāa (The Women) Verse 34

Sahih International: Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever exalted and grand.

It’s clear from this passage that there is no “Golden Rule” in Islam: beating disobedient wives as well as the treatment of the disbelieving “Kafir” mentioned above make this clear. Islamic Law differentiates between men and women, disbelievers and believers, another fact that makes Islam incompatible with Western Civilization.


“You shall not kill.”[23]

The Qur’anic concept:

Chapter (9) sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance) Verse 5

Sahih International: And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

Chapter (9) sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance) Verse 29

Sahih International: Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

Chapter (2) sūrat l-baqarah (The Cow) Verse 191

Sahih International: And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- îaram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

These Ayats (verses) make clear that Islam does not consider the lives of non-believers as sacred or valuable, another aspect of Islam that Pastor Warren may have a hard time selling to his congregation.

“You shall not commit adultery”[24]

Chapter (4) sūrat l-nisāa (The Women) Verse 3

Sahih International: And if you fear that you will not deal justly with the orphan girls, then marry those that please you of [other] women, two or three or four. But if you fear that you will not be just, then [marry only] one or those your right hand possesses.[25] That is more suitable that you may not incline [to injustice].


Sahih Bkukhari Volume 8, Book 77, Number 600 :[26]

Narrated by Abu Said Al-Khudri

That while he was sitting with the Prophet a man from the Ansar came and said, "O Allah's Apostle! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?" Allah's Apostle said, "Do you do that? It is better for you not to do it, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created."

Comment: the Christian ideal of a sacramental marriage between one man and one woman is completely incompatible with up to four wives permitted in Islam, to say nothing of sex with slave girls, or “those your right hand possesses”. It places Western nations at risk when they admit polygamous Muslim immigrants who consider themselves engaged in long term demographic “Civilizational Jihad”.

“You shall not steal”[27]

Anwar al Awlaki said: “The greatest form of income is that of the spoils of war and the greatest profession is being a soldier in the path of Allah. The income generated from booty taken by force from the enemies of Allah is purer and more virtuous than income generated from being a businessman, and engineer, a physician, or a farmer, simply because that was the source of income that Allah destined for his Messenger Muhammad.”[28]

Comment: too many well intentioned people and organizations in the West believe that “violence is caused by poverty.” They delude themselves by thinking that If we would just provide education and opportunity to the Muslims, somehow the violence would stop[29]. Such a view ignores the reality of the Islamic doctrine of Jihad and the Qur’anic mandate for all Muslims to participate. One only need recall the Jihad attack in the summer of 2007 at the Glasgow Airport in the UK, conducted by Muslim National Health physicians! Physicians are in no way uneducated, marginalized or poverty stricken! Yet the apologists classified the attack as “a paradox” and dismissed it.

“You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor”[30]


Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 49, Number 857 :

Narrated by Um Kulthum bint Uqba

That That she heard Allah's Apostle saying, "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."

Sahih Muslim No. 6303[31]

Humaid b. 'Abd al-Rahman b. 'Auf reported that his mother Umm Kulthum daughter of 'Uqba b. Abu Mu'ait, and she was one amongst the first emigrants who pledged allegiance to Allaah's Prophet (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam), as saying that she heard Allaah's Messenger (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) as saying: A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good. Ibn Shihab said he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).

Reliance of the Traveller §r8.2 PERMISSIBLE LYING

“When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory.”

Comment: these verses are well known to every Muslim, and define the concept of “Taqqiya”, or “Sacred Deception” which can and must be used to protect the Muslim or Islam itself. Ironically, I witnessed Ali Hasan, a former candidate for Colorado State Treasurer, absolutely deny any knowledge of this concept! Was this not a perfect example of “Taqqiya”?


The Muslims also will say “We honor Mary” as a pitch for their “Da’wah”,[32] especially to Hispanics, whose devotion to Mary is strong. But as we have seen in the above verses, Mary is NOT the Mother of God, although virtuous.


"When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some doubted. And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, 'All authority has been given to me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.' Amen."


Chapter (8) sūrat l-anfāl (The Spoils of War) Verse 39

Sahih International: And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease - then indeed, Allah is seeing of what they do.

Chapter (2) sūrat l-baqarah (The Cow) Verse 193

Sahih International: Fight them until there is no [more] fitnah and [until] worship is [acknowledged to be] for Allah. But if they cease, then there is to be no aggression except against the oppressors.

Chapter (9) sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance) Verse 111

Sahih International: Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.

Comment: the Great Commission urges the disciples to preach the Gospel and make disciples of all the nations. Islam, on the other hand, views the earth and everything therein as the rightful property of Allah. The believer’s duty, therefore, is to wrest the earth from its present non-Muslim holders and “restore” it to Allah by eternal Jihad!


But what will be the “enemy”[34] response to these comparisons? One will be “citations at 10 paces”, hurled back and forth! But not all citations are equal! A key concept that Westerners must understand is abrogation.


As Muhammad received his so-called “revelations”, people began to realize that his later “revelations” conflicted with his earlier ones. To respond to this criticism, the following Ayats (verses) were “revealed”:

مَا نَنْسَخْ مِنْ آَيَةٍ أَوْ نُنْسِهَا نَأْتِ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْهَا أَوْ مِثْلِهَا أَلَمْ تَعْلَمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ عَلَى كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ ﴿2:106Q﴾

(Q2:106) We bring a better verse or at least the like of it for whatever we abrogate or cause it to be forgotten.[35]

Chapter (16) sūrat l-naḥl (The Bees) Verse 101;

Sahih International: And when We substitute a verse in place of a verse - and Allah is most knowing of what He sends down - they say, "You, [O Muhammad], are but an inventor [of lies]." But most of them do not know.

Chapter (13) sūrat l-raʿd (The Thunder) Verse 39:

Sahih International: Allah eliminates what He wills or confirms, and with Him is the Mother of the Book.

Comment: These verses mean that the later revelations supersede the earlier ones. Usually, the Muslim apologists, (such as Pastor Warren?), will quote abrogated Meccan Suras (Chapters) to convince the congregation and the world that Islam and Christianity are compatible.

Islamic apologists also try to deny that Abrogation exists. They will assert that certain passages of the Qur’an were valid at certain periods of time and not at others. But this is contrary to the Scholarly Consensus (Ijma) that the Qur’an is eternal and unchangeable!


To determine Sura precedence, one must know the Chronological Order of the “Revelations”. The order is well known to every Muslim but obscured in the West by the Muslims and their apologists. Here it is:

The chronological order is from top to bottom, then left to right. Thus, Sura 96 is the first and Sura 5 the last. Suras 9 and 5 are last chronologically, and “Abrogate” (has precedence over) the earlier Suras. Thus, if Pastor Warren quotes an early Sura as “proof” that Islam and Christianity are compatible, chances are it’s been abrogated by a later Medina Sura. Scholars say that Q9:5 and Q9:29 abrogated hundreds of earlier “conciliatory” Meccan Ayats and Suras.

COMBATTING “ISLAMOPHOBIA”: (The OIC’s campaign to criminalize any criticism of Islam)

Here is a document from a 2006 OIC[36] meeting:







5-6 DHUL QA'ADAH 1426H

(7-8 DECEMBER 2005)

The Conference underlined the need to collectively endeavor to reflect the noble Islamic values, counter Islamophobia, defamation of Islam and its values and desecration of Islamic holy sites, and to effectively coordinate with States as well as regional and international institutions and organizations to urge them to criminalize this phenomenon as a form of racism.

The Conference expressed its concern at rising hatred against Islam and Muslims and condemned the recent incident of desecration of the image of the Holy Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) in the media of certain countries and stressed the responsibility of all governments to ensure full respect of all religions and religious symbols and the inapplicability of using the freedom of expression as a pretext to defame religions.


(a) Everyone shall have the right to express his opinion freely in such manner as would not be contrary to the principles of the Shari'ah.

Comment: note here how they are trying to cash in on the Post Modern “Political Correctness” by trying to label “Islamophobia” as a “form of racism”. But Islam is a belief attribute, not a biological one. The purpose of this OIC effort is to disarm the West in the war of ideas by imposing the Shari’ah definition of slander on Western law.

Notice also how they dismiss freedom of speech, one of our cherished liberties, merely as a “pretext to defame religions”. The key here is to understand that “defame”, “insult”, “denigrate” or any other term all fall under the rubric of “slander”.

In the West, “slander” means damaging someone’s reputation by lying. Truth is an absolute defense against charges of slander. But under the Shari’ah, “slander” merely means “saying something about Islam they don’t like” or “revealing something about Islam they don’t wish to be revealed”[37] Muslims are NOT quick to make the distinction or end the confusion, since it serves them well. Even our conservative talk show hosts have failed to pick up on this. I listened to Mike Gallagher one afternoon saying how “we really shouldn’t slander other people’s religion” while discussing this subject. I tried to call in to enlighten him, but was unable to get through.


Another aspect is the “Duality” of Islamic belief. This is the most difficult concept for the Western mind to wrap around. We have talked about “ABROGATION” and how the later Suras and Ayats (Chapters and verses) supersede the earlier ones. But since Allah revealed both, they must both be true even if they are contradictory. The first Ayat (verse) may say something is black, and the later Ayat may say it’s white. In Islamic thought it can be BOTH! Muslims can and do roll out either Ayat as the situation dictates! This is why Muslims can say the attacks on Sept 11, 2001 weren’t the “real Islam” and that Islam is “the Religion of Peace”. Yet Al Qaeda interprets Qur'anic verses in accordance with mainstream scholarly consensus!
But the noted Christian writer C.S. Lewis brings us back to common sense:
“It remains true that all things are possible with God: the intrinsic impossibilities are not things but nonentities. It is no more possible for God than for the weakest of His creatures to carry out both of two mutually exclusive alternatives; not because His power meets an obstacle, but because nonsense remains nonsense even when we talk it about God.”[38]


As Christians, we are called to “reach out in Love to all, since we’re all brothers and sisters in the eyes of God”. But we must do this “reaching out” on the basis of truth with our eyes open. It’s important to understand how Islam views us, and behave intelligently: “Wise as serpents and harmless as doves” as Scripture says. Sayyid Qutb, the noted Islamic political theoretician had some key things to say about “Ecumenism”:

“The chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyahh[39] is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but that only so that the people of Jahiliyyahh may come over to Islam,”[40]

This means that all “outreach” is basically one way Islamic subversion. And the Muslims talk constantly about “bridges”. Understand that hey mean Sayyid Qutb’s bridge!

In a conversation with a Pastor on this subject, he was bursting with pride that he’d had ecumenical events with Muslims for years! “The Imam speaks at our church regularly!” he said. I asked him “how many times have you spoken at a Mosque during their Friday prayers?” I got only puzzled silence! The answer of course was ZERO! Muslims don’t pray with “polytheists” (as those who believe in the Trinity are labeled). To do so would be “shirk”, or a grievous sin! It would be enlightening to this Pastor were he to politely insist that HE speak at the Mosque before the Imam could come back to his church. The squirming, prevaricating and excuses would be a sight to behold! And if the Pastor really insisted, eventually the accusations of “bigotry, hate, and Islamophobia” would soon follow!


At the Presidential Inaugural in January 2009 there was a huge service at the Washington Cathedral. All the high ranking clergy were there: Bishops and Rabbis abounded. The Muslims sent Ingrid Mattson, the then President of ISNA. She was the only one not ordained in attendance. But here are just two of many ahadith that reveal the Islamic doctrine:

“One of the things for which Allaah has singled out men is the acts of worship which require physical strength, such as Jihad, or require a position of leadership such as leading the prayers, etc., are only for men, and women have nothing to do with them.”[41]

“According to the actions of Muslims throughout fourteen hundred years, no woman should be allowed to lead men in prayer.”[42]

Thus, all the Archbishops and Pastors equal only an unordained woman in Muslim eyes. It isn’t hard to grasp the insult. But ignorance is apparently bliss. No one grasped the significance (except the 1.2 billion Muslims), which leads to the next observation:


Chapter (3) sūrat āl ʿim'rān (The Family of Imrān) Verse 110

Yusuf Ali: Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book had faith, it were best for them: among them are some who have faith, but most of them are perverted transgressors.

Comment: If we continue to persist in our ignorance and stupidity concerning Islamic doctrine and in dealing with Islamic Jihad, and continually allow ourselves to be deceived, remaining in our willful blindness, it’s hard not to agree! Nor does it bode well for our survival.


Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) verse 14

Verse 5:14. Sahih International: And from those who say, "We are Christians" We took their covenant; but they forgot a portion of that of which they were reminded. So We caused among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection. And Allah is going to inform them about what they used to do.

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 33.

Sahih International: Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,

Chapter (5) sūrat l-māidah (The Table spread with Food) Verse 51.

Sahih International: O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you – then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people.

Comment: the above bedrock Ayats concerning Christians and Jews cannot be ignored, as much as many Pastors and clergy would like to do so. The smooth talking apologists and Imams in America will soft-sell these verses by saying things like “oh, these are old time verses no one believes anymore” or some such. But look at the treatment of the Copts in Egypt or the Christians in Nigeria, countries where Islam is dominant. Do you think they will treat us (or our grandchildren) any differently if they become powerful here?


We’ve looked briefly at ChrIslam, and it fits nicely with the Muslim Brotherhood’s “General Strategic Goal” of taking down our nation by subverting the churches. The short answer is the Muslim Brotherhood is behind “ChrIslam”, and it’s a part of their plan to undermine our culture and civilization and replace it with an Islamic state. There are other aspects of this subversion besides ChrIslam, but that’s beyond the scope of this paper.

This plan is revealed in a document titled “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America.”[43] The document is only 18 pages, read it at your leisure. The important thing to remember is this: it was written in 1991, captured in 2004, and used as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial in 2008. In the trial, the Muslim defense stipulated this document, meaning they did not dispute its authenticity, nor the veracity of its content.

We’ve briefly covered the difficult Islamic concepts. Abrogation: whereby later verses “abrogate" earlier ones. Islamophobia”: a phony word devised by British Muslims in the 1980’s. It would have you believe that concern about Islam is irrational bigotry. But it’s designed to criminalize criticism of Islam. Duality: a word which refers to the double meanings in Islam. They have two messages: one for their own in the Mosques and another for “the Kuffar”. To expose the deception it to incur howls of “Islamophobia and bigotry!”

We looked at ecumenism and the possibility of reconciliation. We have to face that the Muslim worldview is very different than ours. I remember President Bush saying “I think Palestinian moms want their children to grow up in peace just like American moms want their children to grow up in peace.”[44] Yet there’s overwhelming evidence of the use of child suicide bombers throughout the Middle East[45] in which Muslim parents take pride! (And there’s this: Muslim families have on average five children, as opposed to less than two in the West. A Muslim family can contribute a child or two to “Shaheed” operations and never miss them. Whereas, when the professional Manhattan working single mom loses her designer son in Afghanistan, it’s an irreplaceable catastrophe!!

We’ve compared some key Bible verses with the Qur’an and showed that most of them are hopelessly incompatible, especially concerning the resurrection and the Trinity. Theologically Jesus was merely a prophet of Islam, subordinate to Muhammad. He was not the son of God, and was not crucified and rose again. When he returns, he will slay all non-believers and establish Islam, (probably not the second coming most Christians have in mind).

Let us review the term “Da’wah”. It is crucial here. It is the Muslim invitation to embrace Islam. But its ugly twin sister is Jihad, a fact the Muslims intentionally do not share. Non-believers are always invited to Islam before they are attacked. If the non-believers fail to accept the invitation, then their blood is licit. The non-believers then become the target of Jihad. And so it will be in the United States. Eventually, the violent Jihad will come, with daily attacks throughout the land. This is doctrinal. (See Q9:111)

One is forced to conclude that the real function of “ChrIslam” is to engineer and justify some sort of face-saving submission to Islam by a pacifist clergy hoping to avoid the inevitable violent Jihad.





[1] <> Accessed 25 Mar 2012

[2] Written in Arabic around the edge of the Muslim Brotherhood Logo (See Appendix 1) page 27

[3] “Reliance of the Traveller” h8.14(1), Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Masri, translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller, Amana Publications Beltsville, MD 1991 page 270

[4] “Methodology of Da’wah” by Shammim A. Siddiqi, FORUM FOR ISLAMIC WORK, Brooklyn NY 11217, 1989, pages 85 - 87

[5] Ibid, page 87

[6] Matt 5:17-18, RSV

[7] John 1:1-2

[8] Taken from the “Magnificat", Holy Week, Vol 14, No. 1 page 263

[9] Qur’an selections taken from “A Self-Study Course on Political Islam” CPSI, LLC, 2008, pages 3-87 to 3-89

[10] A hated unbeliever. This is NOT a neutral term! This is a vicious insult!

[11] Qur’anic references from <> Accessed March 2012

[12] Note that to “abolish Jizya” means non-Muslims will no longer have the option to pay the annual poll tax (the jizyah) to preserve their lives by “buying their head” for another year! They will only have the choice either to convert or to die!

[13] John 14:6, RSV

[14] B3,48,850 <> Accessed March 2012

[15] “Methodology of Da’wah” Shamim A. Siddiqi, The Forum for Islamic Work, Brooklyn NY 11217, 1989, page 85

[16] John 1:1, RSV

[18] “Dominus Iesus” on the Unicity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church , Holy See, Vatican Aug 6, 2000, pages 5- 6.

[19] John 14:14, RSV

[20] “The Life of Muhammad” Ibn Ishaq, translated by A. Guillaume, Oxford University Press, NY, 1955, §404 page 272

[21] 1 Corinthians 2:9

American Standard Version (ASV)

[22] Luke 6:31 NIV

[23] Ex: 20:13 RSV

[24] Ex 20:14, RSV

[25] Note: the phrase “those your right hand possesses” refers to slave girls. Another interesting concept that if a woman is captured, under Islamic Law her marriage is considered null and void, making her immediately eligible for sexual abuse by her Muslim captors, (although I cannot find the Qur’anic Citation or the hadith).

[26]<> Accessed 26 April, 2012. The question here had to do with whether or not Muhammad’s men should rape their captive slave girls, because if they were pregnant, they would be worth less on the slave markets.

[27] Ex 20:15 RSV

[28] “inspire” Winter 1431| 2010 page 55.

[29] Deepak Chopra called for a “Muslim Marshall Plan” after the Mumbai attacks in November 2009, based on this misperception. As if billions in oil revenues already going to Islamic countries could not be used for education and infrastructure instead of Jihad!

[30] Ex 20: 17 RSV


[32] The Muslim word for the invitation to Islam: their proslytization. But the difference from the Christian version is the ugly twin sister of Da’wah: Jihad! If you do NOT accept the invitation, Muslims will war against you to force your submission to the Shari’ah.

[33] Matt 28: 17-20 RSV

[34] Yes I use the term “enemy”. Again, the apologists blanch, and bend over backwards to assure Muslims we are NOT at war with them! In the Progressive worldview, there is no truth, right or wrong, nor an enemy: only “misunderstanding” that can be resolved with “dialogue”. But it takes “two to tango”, so to speak! And there’s this: Muslims define “war against Islam” as merely resisting the Islamization process! Qur’anically, the only peace possible with Islam is submission!

[35]<> Accessed 26 March 2012

[36] IOC: the “Organization of the Islamic Cooperation”, and organization of 57 Islamic States, which is the largest voting bloc in the United Nations

[37] See “Reliance of the Traveller” § r2.2, r 3.1. See footnote 3

[38] “The Problem of Pain” C.S. Lewis, Harper One, 10 E. 53rd, NY, NY 10022. 2001, page 18

[39] Jahilliyyahh is defined as “ignorant society”. Initially, pre-Islamic Arabian societies, but in Sayyid Qutb’s meaning today, any non-Islamic society.

[40] “Milestones” Sayyid Qutb, Maktbah Booksellers and Publishers, Birmingham England © 2006 Page 156

[41]Modern Day Trojan Horse” ,Solomon & E Al Maqdisi,ANM Publishers, Charlottesville VA 2009 page 104

[42] Badaa’i, 2/289

[43] <>Accessed 26 March 2012




Blog Archive

About Me